From identifying patient safety risks to reporting patient complaints: A grounded theory study on patients' hospital experiences

Author:

Gyberg Anna12ORCID,Brezicka Thomas3,Wijk Helle134,Ulin Kerstin12

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

2. Department of Medicine, Geriatrics, and Emergency Care Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden

3. Department of Quality Assurance Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden

4. Center of Health Care Architecture Chalmers University Gothenburg Sweden

Abstract

AbstractAimTo explore how patients with hospital experience construct patient safety, from the identification of a patient safety risk to the decision to file a complaint.BackgroundPatients play an important role in the prevention of adverse events in hospitals, but the ability of patients to act and influence their own safety is still challenged by multiple factors. Understanding how patients perceive risk and act to prevent harm may shed light on how to enhance patients' opportunities to participate in patient safety.DesignThe research design of this study is qualitative and exploratory.MethodsTwelve participants who had experienced Swedish hospital care were interviewed between June 2022 and July 2023. The method of analysis was constructivist grounded theory, focusing on social processes. The COREQ checklist for qualitative research was followed.ResultsFour categories were constructed: (1) defining the boundary between one's own capacity and that of the hospital, (2) acting to minimize the impact on one's safety, (3) finding oneself in the hands of healthcare professionals and (4) exploring the boundaries between normality and abnormality of the situation. This process was captured in the core category of navigating the path of least suffering. This illustrated how the participants constructed meaning about patient safety risks and showed that they prevented multiple adverse events.ConclusionsProvided that participants were able to act independently, they avoided a multitude of adverse events. When they were dependent on healthcare professionals, their safety became more vulnerable. Failure to respond to the participants' concerns could lead to long‐term suffering.Relevance to Clinical PracticeBy responding immediately to patients' concerns about their safety, healthcare professionals can help prevent avoidable suffering and exhaustive searching for someone in the healthcare system who will take their needs seriously.Patient ContributionA member check was performed with the help of one of the participants who read the findings to confirm familiarity.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3