Abstract
ObjectivesIncreasing access to mental health support is a key factor for treating mental disorders, however, important barriers complicate help-seeking, among them, mental health related stigma being most prominent. We aimed to systematically review the current evidence for interventions focusing on reducing stigma related to mental health problems in small and medium enterprises (SMEs).DesignSystematic review with a focus on interventions targeting mental health related stigma in the workplace in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The methodological quality of included articles was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies Scale.Data sourcesPubMed, Ovid Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Cochrane databases and Google Scholar were searched from January 2010 until November 2022.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesWe included experimental or quasi-experimental studies about workplace interventions aiming to reduce stigma, where the outcomes were measured in terms of stigmatisation against depression, anxiety and/or other mental health problems.Data extraction and synthesisRecords were screened by two independent reviewers after inspecting titles and abstracts and a full-text read of the articles to assess whether they meet inclusion criteria. The results were synthesised narratively.ResultsWe identified 22 intervention studies, 3 with high quality, 13 with moderate quality and 6 with weak quality. Only 2 studies included SMEs, but no study focused on SMEs exclusively . The mode of delivery of the intervention was face to face in 15 studies, online in 4 studies and mixed in 3 studies. We found a significant reduction in stigmatising attitudes in almost all studies (20/22), using 10 different instruments/scales. Effects seemed to be independent of company size. Online interventions were found to be shorter, but seemed to be as effective as face-to-face interventions.ConclusionsAlthough we did not find interventions focusing exclusively on SMEs, it is likely that antistigma interventions also will work in smaller workplaces.Trial registrationPROSPERO: ID: CRD42020191307
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Reference58 articles.
1. Mental health impact of social capital interventions: a systematic review;Flores;Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol,2018
2. Leka S , Jain A , Iavicoli S , et al . An evaluation of the policy context on psychosocial risks and mental health in the workplace in the European Union: achievements, challenges, and the future. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:213089. doi:10.1155/2015/213089
3. The relationship between depression symptoms, absenteeism and presenteeism;Johnston;J Affect Disord,2019
4. Bryan ML , Bryce AM , Roberts J . Presenteeism in the UK: effects of physical and mental health on worker productivity. The Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series (SERPS), 2020: 2020005.
5. Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: a meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis;Niedhammer;Scand J Work Environ Health,2021
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献