Abstract
ObjectiveTo determine if the association of dairy foods with cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes differs between studies with food industry ties versus those without industry ties. To determine whether studies with or without industry ties differ in their risk of bias.Eligibility criteriaWe included cohort and case–control studies that estimated the association of dairy foods with CVD outcomes in healthy adults.Information sourcesWe searched eight databases on 1 February 2019 from 2000 to 2019 and hand searched reference lists.Risk of biasWe used the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies-of Exposure tool.Included studies43 studies (3 case–controls, 40 cohorts).Synthesis of resultsThere was no clear evidence of an association between studies with industry ties (1/14) versus no industry ties (8/29) and the reporting of favourable results, risk ratio (RR)=0.26 (95% CI 0.04 to 1.87; n=43 studies) and studies with industry ties (4/14) versus no industry ties (11/29) and favourable conclusions, RR=0.75 (95% CI 0.29 to 1.95; n=43). Studies with industry sponsorship, (HR=0.78; n=3 studies) showed a decreased magnitude of risk of CVD outcomes compared with studies with no industry sponsorship (HR=0.97; n=18) (ratio of HRs 0.80 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.97); p=0.03).Strengths and limitations of evidenceEvery study had an overall high risk of bias rating; this was primarily due to confounding.InterpretationThere was no clear evidence of an association between studies with food industry ties and the reporting of favourable results and conclusions compared with studies without industry ties. The statistically significant difference in the magnitude of effects identified in industry-sponsored studies compared with non-industry-sponsored studies, however, is important in quantifying industry influence on studies included in dietary guidelines.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019129659.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献