Abstract
Abstract
Background
SARS-CoV-2 lacks sentience and can only be spread through human behaviour. Government instructions to the general public include: (a) limiting time spent outside the home, (b) staying more than 1 m away from people outside the household at all times, and (c) maintaining hand hygiene. Current evidence suggests high rates of adherence to such instructions, but interventions to sustain adherence to government instructions in the long term can only be developed if we know why people do or do not adhere to them. The aims were to assess levels of public adherence to government instructions to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2, but more importantly to gauge why people were or were not adhering to instructions.
Methods
Cross-sectional survey of 2252 adults who were representative of the UK population. Data were analysed descriptively, and using one-sample t-tests, within-participants ANOVA and multiple linear regression.
Results
The sample reported mostly adhering to UK government instructions to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission, with 5% or fewer people reporting active resistance to instructions. People generally reported high levels of capability, opportunity and motivation to follow the instructions, but perceived relatively few physical and social opportunities. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that better adherence was associated with older age, being a woman, having a white ethnic background, and with perceiving greater levels of capabilities, opportunities and motivations.
Conclusions
Interventions targeted at people with black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds, men and younger people that focus on increasing capabilities, providing greater opportunities and boosting motivations are needed to support continued adherence to government instructions to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Further research is required to track changes in people’s capabilities, opportunities, motivations and behaviours in response to the ongoing emergency, any changes in government instructions, and to adapt the present procedures to other emergency situations.
Funder
Manchester Centre for Health Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference17 articles.
1. Johns Hopkins University (2021). Retrieved from: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2021.
2. Gartner, A., Roberts, L., & Hope, C. (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/coronavirus-covid-vaccine-uk-trials-news/. Accessed 20 Jan 2021.
3. UK Government. (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-stay-at-home-guidance/stay-at-home-guidance-for-households-with-possible-coronavirus-covid-19-infection. Accessed 20 Jan 2021.
4. UK Office for National Statistics. (2020a). Retrieved from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/healthandwellbeing/bulletins/coronavirusandthesocialimpactsongreatbritain/30april2020. Accessed 20 Jan 2021.
5. BBC News. (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52389285. Accessed 20 Jan 2021.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献