Abstract
Background
Hospital infection control policies protect patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) and limit the spread of pathogens, but adherence to COVID-19 guidance varies. We examined hospital HCWs’ enactment of social distancing and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic, factors influencing these behaviours, and acceptability and feasibility of strategies to increase social distancing.
Methods
An online, cross-sectional survey (n = 86) and semi-structured interviews (n = 22) with HCWs in two English hospitals during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (May-December 2020). The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation (COM-B) model of behaviour change underpinned survey and topic guide questions. Spearman Rho correlations examined associations between COM-B domains and behaviours. Interviews were analysed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Potential strategies to improve social distancing were selected using the Behaviour Change Wheel and discussed in a stakeholder workshop (n = 8 participants).
Results
Social distancing enactment was low, with 85% of participants reporting very frequently or always being in close contact with others in communal areas. PPE use was high (88% very frequently or always using PPE in typical working day). Social distancing was associated with Physical Opportunity (e.g., size of physical space), Psychological Capability (e.g., clarity of guidance), and Social Opportunity (e.g., support from managers). Use of PPE was associated with Psychological Capability (e.g., training), Physical Opportunity (e.g., availability), Social Opportunity (e.g., impact on interactions with patients), and Reflective Motivation (e.g., beliefs that PPE is effective). Local champions and team competition were viewed as feasible strategies to improve social distancing.
Conclusions
It is valuable to understand and compare the drivers of individual protective behaviours; when faced with the same level of perceived threat, PPE use was high whereas social distancing was rarely enacted. Identified influences represent targets for intervention strategies in response to future infectious disease outbreaks.
Funder
MRC UKRI
National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit
Centre of excellence in Infectious Disease Research
Liverpool COVID-19 Partnership Strategic Research Fund
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference50 articles.
1. Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study;LH Nguyen;Lancet Public Health,2020
2. Differential occupational risks to healthcare workers from SARS-CoV-2 observed during a prospective observational study.;DW Eyre;Elife,2020
3. Pandemic peak SARS-CoV-2 infection and seroconversion rates in London frontline health-care workers;CF Houlihan;Lancet,2020
4. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis;S Pappa;Brain, behavior, and immunity.,2020
5. Prevalence of psychological morbidities among general population, healthcare workers and COVID-19 patients amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.;Y Krishnamoorthy;Psychiatry Research.,2020