Abstract
Abstract
Background
The area of self-regulated learning integrates the fields of metacognition and self-regulation and assumes that the student is an active processor of information capable of self-regulating his learning by putting together the cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational components. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) is a benchmark for the measurement of self-regulated learning. However, the field of study does not show adequate evidence of its structural validity. The vast majority of studies involving this question present serious methodological mistakes, compromising the evidence of validity.
Objective
Our study investigates the structural validity of MSLQ including all 15 scales and corrects relevant mistakes in the previous studies.
Method
We tested different models through item confirmatory factor analysis in a convenience sample of 670 college students (M = 22.8 years, SD = 5.2) from a public Brazilian university in the technological area. The models with the ML, MLR, MLM and WLMSV estimators.
Results
Only WLSMV produced models with acceptable fit. The final model has a bi-factor structure with a general factor (self-regulated learning), 15 components as first-order factors, and four broad components as second-order factors. Twelve first-order components, all second-order components and the general factor had acceptable reliability. The components’ elaboration, intrinsic goal orientation and metacognitive self-regulation, did not show acceptable reliability, in terms of McDonald’s omega.
Conclusion
Considering the worldwide importance of the MSLQ, we do not recommend the use of the measurement of these components for clinical practice and psychoeducational diagnosis until new studies show that this low reliability only occurs in our sample. Our study shows new evidence, correcting many previous methodological mistakes and producing initial evidence favorable to the factor structure of the MSLQ.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Adesope, O., Hunsu, N., Van W., Bernard J., Austin, B., Richards, R.F. & Dutta, P. (2017). Work in progress: Assessing engineering students’ motivation and learning strategies-a psychometric analysis of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017-June. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2%2D%2D29144
2. Alkjarusi, H., Neisler, O., Al-Barwani, T., Clayton, D., Khan, M., Al-Yahmadi, H., & Al-Kalbani, M. (2012). Psychometric properties of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire for. College Student Journal, 46(3), 567–581 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256349252_Psychometric_properties_of_the_Motivated_Strategies_for_Learning_Questionnaire_for_Sultan_Qaboos_University_students.
3. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007.
4. Carroll, K. A., & Harris, C. M. (2020). Using A repetitive instructional intervention to improve students’ higher-order thinking skills. College Teaching, 69(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1823310.
5. Casali, N., Ghisi, M., Rizzato, R., Meneghetti, C., & De Beni, R. (2022). Validation of the “study-anxiety” questionnaire: A scale for the initial assessment of university students seeking psychological help. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 44, 1158–1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-09982-8.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献