Nomenclatural issues concerning cultured yeasts and other fungi: why it is important to avoid unneeded name changes

Author:

Yurkov AndreyORCID,Alves ArturORCID,Bai Feng-YanORCID,Boundy-Mills KyriaORCID,Buzzini PietroORCID,Čadež NežaORCID,Cardinali GianluigiORCID,Casaregola SergeORCID,Chaturvedi VishnuORCID,Collin Valérie,Fell Jack W.ORCID,Girard Victoria,Groenewald MarizethORCID,Hagen FerryORCID,Hittinger Chris ToddORCID,Kachalkin Aleksey V.ORCID,Kostrzewa MarkusORCID,Kouvelis VassiliORCID,Libkind DiegoORCID,Liu XinzhanORCID,Maier ThomasORCID,Meyer WielandORCID,Péter GáborORCID,Piątek MarcinORCID,Robert VincentORCID,Rosa Carlos A.ORCID,Sampaio Jose PauloORCID,Sipiczki MatthiasORCID,Stadler MarcORCID,Sugita TakashiORCID,Sugiyama Junta,Takagi HiroshiORCID,Takashima MasakoORCID,Turchetti BenedettaORCID,Wang Qi-MingORCID,Boekhout TeunORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe unambiguous application of fungal names is important to communicate scientific findings. Names are critical for (clinical) diagnostics, legal compliance, and regulatory controls, such as biosafety, food security, quarantine regulations, and industrial applications. Consequently, the stability of the taxonomic system and the traceability of nomenclatural changes is crucial for a broad range of users and taxonomists. The unambiguous application of names is assured by the preservation of nomenclatural history and the physical organisms representing a name. Fungi are extremely diverse in terms of ecology, lifestyle, and methods of study. Predominantly unicellular fungi known as yeasts are usually investigated as living cultures. Methods to characterize yeasts include physiological (growth) tests and experiments to induce a sexual morph; both methods require viable cultures. Thus, the preservation and availability of viable reference cultures are important, and cultures representing reference material are cited in species descriptions. Historical surveys revealed drawbacks and inconsistencies between past practices and modern requirements as stated in the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (ICNafp). Improper typification of yeasts is a common problem, resulting in a large number invalid yeast species names. With this opinion letter, we address the problem that culturable microorganisms, notably some fungi and algae, require specific provisions under the ICNafp. We use yeasts as a prominent example of fungi known from cultures. But viable type material is important not only for yeasts, but also for other cultivable Fungi that are characterized by particular morphological structures (a specific type of spores), growth properties, and secondary metabolites. We summarize potential proposals which, in our opinion, will improve the stability of fungal names, in particular by protecting those names for which the reference material can be traced back to the original isolate.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3