Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set
-
Published:2021-02-25
Issue:1
Volume:20
Page:
-
ISSN:1475-2875
-
Container-title:Malaria Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Malar J
Author:
Horning Matthew P.ORCID, Delahunt Charles B., Bachman Christine M., Luchavez Jennifer, Luna Christian, Hu Liming, Jaiswal Mayoore S., Thompson Clay M., Kulhare Sourabh, Janko Samantha, Wilson Benjamin K., Ostbye Travis, Mehanian Martha, Gebrehiwot Roman, Yun Grace, Bell David, Proux Stephane, Carter Jane Y., Oyibo Wellington, Gamboa Dionicia, Dhorda Mehul, Vongpromek Ranitha, Chiodini Peter L., Ogutu Bernhards, Long Earl G., Tun Kyaw, Burkot Thomas R., Lilley Ken, Mehanian Courosh
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Manual microscopy remains a widely-used tool for malaria diagnosis and clinical studies, but it has inconsistent quality in the field due to variability in training and field practices. Automated diagnostic systems based on machine learning hold promise to improve quality and reproducibility of field microscopy. The World Health Organization (WHO) has designed a 55-slide set (WHO 55) for their External Competence Assessment of Malaria Microscopists (ECAMM) programme, which can also serve as a valuable benchmark for automated systems. The performance of a fully-automated malaria diagnostic system, EasyScan GO, on a WHO 55 slide set was evaluated.
Methods
The WHO 55 slide set is designed to evaluate microscopist competence in three areas of malaria diagnosis using Giemsa-stained blood films, focused on crucial field needs: malaria parasite detection, malaria parasite species identification (ID), and malaria parasite quantitation. The EasyScan GO is a fully-automated system that combines scanning of Giemsa-stained blood films with assessment algorithms to deliver malaria diagnoses. This system was tested on a WHO 55 slide set.
Results
The EasyScan GO achieved 94.3 % detection accuracy, 82.9 % species ID accuracy, and 50 % quantitation accuracy, corresponding to WHO microscopy competence Levels 1, 2, and 1, respectively. This is, to our knowledge, the best performance of a fully-automated system on a WHO 55 set.
Conclusions
EasyScan GO’s expert ratings in detection and quantitation on the WHO 55 slide set point towards its potential value in drug efficacy use-cases, as well as in some case management situations with less stringent species ID needs. Improved runtime may enable use in general case management settings.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Parasitology
Reference29 articles.
1. WHO. World Malaria Report 2019. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2019. 2. Zurovac D, Midia B, Ochola SA, English M, Snow RW. Microscopy and outpatient malaria case management among older children and adults in Kenya. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11:432–40. 3. Nazare-Pembele G, Rojas L, Nunez FA. Lack of knowledge regarding the microscopic diagnosis of malaria by technicians of the laboratory network in Luanda, Angola. Biomedica. 2016;36:149–55. 4. Poostchi M, Silamut K, Maude R, Jaeger S, Thoma G. Image analysis and machine learning for detecting malaria. Transl Res. 2018;194:36–55. 5. Delahunt CB, Jaiswal MS, Horning MP, Janko S, Thompson CM, Kulhare S, et al. Fully-automated patient-level malaria assessment on field-prepared thin blood film microscopy images. In: Proc Global Humanitarian Technologies Conf. 2019;1–8.
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|