Author:
Villinger Karoline,Wahl Deborah R.,Engel Kai,Renner Britta
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Sugar overconsumption is a major contributor to overweight and obesity, with daily consumption greatly exceeding the WHO’s recommendations. The aim of the present study was to determine whether using a functionally modified sugar shaker as a food environment nudge could be an effective means to reduce the sugar used in hot beverages.
Methods
Sugar shakers were functionally modified to reduce the amount of sugar in each pour by 47%. A real-world experiment was conducted to compare the amount of added sugar per hot beverage during default and nudge conditions over the course of four weeks (17,233 hot beverages sold) in a university take-away café. In addition, 59 customers were surveyed to evaluate the acceptance of the intervention.
Results
Modifying the functional design of sugar shakers resulted in a reduction of added sugar by 20% (d = 1.35) compared to the default condition. In the survey, most participants evaluated the intervention strategy positively.
Conclusion
The present real-world experiment demonstrates that a simple environmental intervention can significantly reduce sugar consumption in public places while meeting with consumer approval, making it a promising means of reducing sugar overconsumption.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Nutrition and Dietetics,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference23 articles.
1. Heuer T. Sugar Consumption in Germany Aktuelle Ernährungsmedizin 2018;43:8–11, Zuckerkonsum in Deutschland, S 01. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0659-8828.
2. World Health Organization. Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children 2015 [Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/149782 /9789241549028_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y].
3. Cassady BA, Considine RV, Mattes RD. Beverage consumption, appetite, and energy intake: what did you expect? Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(3):587–93. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.025437.
4. Verplanken B. (Ed.). Psychology of habit: Springer; 2018.
5. Szaszi B, Palinkas A, Palfi B, Szollosi A, Aczel B. A systematic scoping review of the choice architecture movement: toward understanding when and why nudges work. J Behav Decis Mak. 2018;31(3):355–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2035.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献