A comparison of marker-based estimators of inbreeding and inbreeding depression

Author:

Caballero ArmandoORCID,Fernández Almudena,Villanueva Beatriz,Toro Miguel A.

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe availability of genome-wide marker data allows estimation of inbreeding coefficients (F, the probability of identity-by-descent, IBD) and, in turn, estimation of the rate of inbreeding depression (ΔID). We investigated, by computer simulations, the accuracy of the most popular estimators of inbreeding based on molecular markers when computingFand ΔID in populations under random mating, equalization of parental contributions, and artificially selected populations. We assessed estimators described by Li and Horvitz (FLH1andFLH2), VanRaden (FVR1andFVR2), Yang and colleagues (FYA1andFYA2), marker homozygosity (FHOM), runs of homozygosity (FROH) and estimates based on pedigree (FPED) in comparison with estimates obtained from IBD measures (FIBD).ResultsIf the allele frequencies of a base population taken as a reference for the computation of inbreeding are known, all estimators based on marker allele frequencies are highly correlated withFIBDand provide accurate estimates of the mean ΔID. If base population allele frequencies are unknown and current frequencies are used in the estimations, the largest correlation withFIBDis generally obtained byFLH1and the best estimator of ΔID isFYA2. The estimatorsFVR2andFLH2have the poorest performance in most scenarios. The assumption that base population allele frequencies are equal to 0.5 results in very biased estimates of the average inbreeding coefficient but they are highly correlated withFIBDand give relatively good estimates of ΔID. Estimates obtained directly from marker homozygosity (FHOM) substantially overestimated ΔID. Estimates based on runs of homozygosity (FROH) provide accurate estimates of inbreeding and ΔID. Finally, estimates based on pedigree (FPED) show a lower correlation withFIBDthan molecular estimators but provide rather accurate estimates of ΔID. An analysis of data from a pig population supports the main findings of the simulations.ConclusionsWhen base population allele frequencies are known, all marker-allele frequency-based estimators of inbreeding coefficients generally show a high correlation withFIBDand provide good estimates of ΔID. When base population allele frequencies are unknown,FLH1is the marker frequency-based estimator that is most correlated withFIBD, andFYA2provides the most accurate estimates of ΔID. Estimates fromFROHare also very precise in most scenarios. The estimatorsFVR2andFLH2have the poorest performances.

Funder

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

Secretaria Xeral de Investigación e Desenvolvemento, Xunta de Galicia

European Maritime and Fisheries Fund

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology,General Medicine,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference78 articles.

1. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA. Introduction to conservation genetics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

2. Lynch M, Walsh B. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates Inc.; 1998.

3. Hedrick PW. Genetics of populations. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2010.

4. Caballero A. Quantitative genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020.

5. Wright S. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationships. Am Nat. 1922;56:330–9.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3