Safe birth in cultural safety in southern Mexico: a pragmatic non-inferiority cluster-randomised controlled trial

Author:

Sarmiento IvánORCID,Paredes-Solís SergioORCID,de Jesús García AbrahamORCID,Maciel Paulino Nadia,Serrano de los Santos Felipe René,Legorreta-Soberanis JoséORCID,Zuluaga GermánORCID,Cockcroft AnneORCID,Andersson NeilORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAvailable research on the contribution of traditional midwifery to safe motherhood focuses on retraining and redefining traditional midwives, assuming cultural prominence of Western ways. Our objective was to test if supporting traditional midwives on their own terms increases cultural safety (respect of Indigenous traditions) without worsening maternal health outcomes.MethodsPragmatic parallel-group cluster-randomised controlled non-inferiority trial in four municipalities in Guerrero State, southern Mexico, withNahua,Na savi,Me’phaaandNancue ñomndaaIndigenous groups. The study included all pregnant women in 80 communities and 30 traditional midwives in 40 intervention communities. Between July 2015 and April 2017, traditional midwives and their apprentices received a monthly stipend and support from a trained intercultural broker, and local official health personnel attended a workshop for improving attitudes towards traditional midwifery. Forty communities in two control municipalities continued with usual health services. Trained Indigenous female interviewers administered a baseline and follow-up household survey, interviewing all women who reported pregnancy or childbirth in all involved municipalities since January 2016. Primary outcomes included childbirth and neonatal complications, perinatal deaths, and postnatal complications, and secondary outcomes were traditional childbirth (at home, in vertical position, with traditional midwife and family), access and experience in Western healthcare, food intake, reduction of heavy work, and cost of health care.ResultsAmong 872 completed pregnancies, women in intervention communities had lower rates of primary outcomes (perinatal deaths or childbirth or neonatal complications) (RD -0.06 95%CI − 0.09 to − 0.02) and reported more traditional childbirths (RD 0.10 95%CI 0.02 to 0.18). Among institutional childbirths, women from intervention communities reported more traditional management of placenta (RD 0.34 95%CI 0.21 to 0.48) but also more non-traditional cold-water baths (RD 0.10 95%CI 0.02 to 0.19). Among home-based childbirths, women from intervention communities had fewer postpartum complications (RD -0.12 95%CI − 0.27 to 0.01).ConclusionsSupporting traditional midwifery increased culturally safe childbirth without worsening health outcomes. The fixed population size restricted our confidence for inference of non-inferiority for mortality outcomes. Traditional midwifery could contribute to safer birth among Indigenous communities if, instead of attempting to replace traditional practices, health authorities promoted intercultural dialogue.Trial registrationRetrospectively registeredISRCTN12397283. Trial status: concluded.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference75 articles.

1. Harrison KA. Are traditional birth attendants good for improving maternal and perinatal health? No. BMJ. 2011;342:d3308. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d3308.

2. Ana J. Are traditional birth attendants good for improving maternal and perinatal health? Yes. BMJ. 2011;342:d3310. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d3310.

3. Gill CJ, Hamer DH, Knapp AB. Dispelling the myths surrounding traditional birth attendants. BMJ. 2011;343:d4481. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4481.

4. International Labour Organization. International standard classification of occupations 2008 (ISCO-08): structure, group definitions and correspondence tables. Geneve: International Labour Office; 2012. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/mcgill/detail.action?docID=991922. Accessed 10 May 2020

5. Bergström S, Goodburn E. The role of traditional birth attendants in the reduction of maternal mortality. In: Safe motherhood strategies: a review of the evidence. Antwerp: ITG Press; 2001. p. 77–96.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3