Abstract
AbstractBackgroundAvailable research on the contribution of traditional midwifery to safe motherhood focuses on retraining and redefining traditional midwives, assuming cultural prominence of Western ways. Our objective was to test if supporting traditional midwives on their own terms increases cultural safety (respect of Indigenous traditions) without worsening maternal health outcomes.MethodsPragmatic parallel-group cluster-randomised controlled non-inferiority trial in four municipalities in Guerrero State, southern Mexico, withNahua,Na savi,Me’phaaandNancue ñomndaaIndigenous groups. The study included all pregnant women in 80 communities and 30 traditional midwives in 40 intervention communities. Between July 2015 and April 2017, traditional midwives and their apprentices received a monthly stipend and support from a trained intercultural broker, and local official health personnel attended a workshop for improving attitudes towards traditional midwifery. Forty communities in two control municipalities continued with usual health services. Trained Indigenous female interviewers administered a baseline and follow-up household survey, interviewing all women who reported pregnancy or childbirth in all involved municipalities since January 2016. Primary outcomes included childbirth and neonatal complications, perinatal deaths, and postnatal complications, and secondary outcomes were traditional childbirth (at home, in vertical position, with traditional midwife and family), access and experience in Western healthcare, food intake, reduction of heavy work, and cost of health care.ResultsAmong 872 completed pregnancies, women in intervention communities had lower rates of primary outcomes (perinatal deaths or childbirth or neonatal complications) (RD -0.06 95%CI − 0.09 to − 0.02) and reported more traditional childbirths (RD 0.10 95%CI 0.02 to 0.18). Among institutional childbirths, women from intervention communities reported more traditional management of placenta (RD 0.34 95%CI 0.21 to 0.48) but also more non-traditional cold-water baths (RD 0.10 95%CI 0.02 to 0.19). Among home-based childbirths, women from intervention communities had fewer postpartum complications (RD -0.12 95%CI − 0.27 to 0.01).ConclusionsSupporting traditional midwifery increased culturally safe childbirth without worsening health outcomes. The fixed population size restricted our confidence for inference of non-inferiority for mortality outcomes. Traditional midwifery could contribute to safer birth among Indigenous communities if, instead of attempting to replace traditional practices, health authorities promoted intercultural dialogue.Trial registrationRetrospectively registeredISRCTN12397283. Trial status: concluded.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference75 articles.
1. Harrison KA. Are traditional birth attendants good for improving maternal and perinatal health? No. BMJ. 2011;342:d3308. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d3308.
2. Ana J. Are traditional birth attendants good for improving maternal and perinatal health? Yes. BMJ. 2011;342:d3310. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d3310.
3. Gill CJ, Hamer DH, Knapp AB. Dispelling the myths surrounding traditional birth attendants. BMJ. 2011;343:d4481. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4481.
4. International Labour Organization. International standard classification of occupations 2008 (ISCO-08): structure, group definitions and correspondence tables. Geneve: International Labour Office; 2012. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/mcgill/detail.action?docID=991922. Accessed 10 May 2020
5. Bergström S, Goodburn E. The role of traditional birth attendants in the reduction of maternal mortality. In: Safe motherhood strategies: a review of the evidence. Antwerp: ITG Press; 2001. p. 77–96.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献