Indigenous maternal and infant outcomes and women's experiences of midwifery care: A mixed‐methods systematic review

Author:

McNeil Deborah123,Elliott Sarah A.4,Wong Angie15,Kromm Seija12,Bialy Liza4,Montesanti Stephanie67,Purificati‐Fuñe Adam8,Juul Sonje1,Roach Pamela19,Bromely Jackie10,Tailfeathers Esther11,Amyotte Maddie12,Oster Richard T.156

Affiliation:

1. Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

2. Maternal Newborn Child & Youth Strategic Clinical Network™ Alberta Health Services Edmonton Alberta Canada

3. Faculty of Nursing University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

4. Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, College of Health Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

5. Indigenous Wellness Core Alberta Health Services Edmonton Alberta Canada

6. School of Public Health College of Health Sciences Edmonton Alberta Canada

7. Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health College of Health Sciences Edmonton Alberta Canada

8. Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural, Life & Environmental Sciences, College of Natural & Applied Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

9. Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

10. Awo Taan Healing Lodge Society Calgary Alberta Canada

11. Blood Tribe Department of Health Stand Off Alberta Canada

12. ihkapaskwa Indigenous Wellness Collective Fort McMurray Alberta Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe impact of midwifery, and especially Indigenous midwifery, care for Indigenous women and communities has not been comprehensively reviewed. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a mixed‐methods systematic review to understand Indigenous maternal and infant outcomes and women's' experiences with midwifery care.MethodsWe searched nine databases to identify primary studies reporting on midwifery and Indigenous maternal and infant birth outcomes and experiences, published in English since 2000. We synthesized quantitative and qualitative outcome data using a convergent segregated mixed‐methods approach and used a mixed‐methods appraisal tool (MMAT) to assess the methodological quality of included studies. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool (ATSI QAT) was used to appraise the inclusion of Indigenous perspectives in the evidence.ResultsOut of 3044 records, we included 35 individual studies with 55% (19 studies) reporting on maternal and infant health outcomes. Comparative studies (n = 13) showed no significant differences in mortality rates but identified reduced preterm births, earlier prenatal care, and an increased number of prenatal visits for Indigenous women receiving midwifery care. Quality of care studies indicated a preference for midwifery care among Indigenous women. Sixteen qualitative studies highlighted three key findings ‐ culturally safe care, holistic care, and improved access to care. The majority of studies were of high methodological quality (91% met ≥80% criteria), while only 14% of studies were considered to have appropriately included Indigenous perspectives.ConclusionThis review demonstrates the value of midwifery care for Indigenous women, providing evidence to support policy recommendations promoting midwifery care as a physically and culturally safe model for Indigenous women and families.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3