A cross-country comparison of user experience of public autonomous transport
-
Published:2021-03-08
Issue:1
Volume:13
Page:
-
ISSN:1867-0717
-
Container-title:European Transport Research Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur. Transp. Res. Rev.
Author:
Bellone MauroORCID, Ismailogullari Azat, Kantala Tommi, Mäkinen Sami, Soe Ralf-Martin, Kyyrö Milla Åman
Abstract
AbstractAutonomous solutions for transportation are emerging worldwide, and one of the sectors that will benefit the most from these solutions is the public transport by shifting toward the new paradigm of Mobility as a Service (MaaS). Densely populated areas cannot afford an increase in individual transportation due to space limitation, congestion, and pollution.Working towards more effective and inclusive mobility in public areas, this paper compares user experiences of autonomous public transport across Baltic countries, with the final goal of gaining an increased insight into public needs. User experience was evaluated through questionnaires gathered along pilot projects implementing a public transportation line, using an automated electric minibus between 2018 and 2019. To have sufficient diversity in the data, the pilot projects were implemented in several cities in the Baltic Sea Area. The data analysed in this paper specifically refer to the cities of Helsinki (Finland), Tallinn (Estonia), Kongsberg (Norway), and Gdańsk (Poland).Across all cities, passengers provided remarkably positive feedback regarding personal security and safety onboard. The overall feedback, which was very positive in general, showed statistically significant differences across the groups of cities (Kongsberg, Helsinki, Tallinn and Gdansk), partially explicable by the differences in the route design. In addition, across all cities and feedback topics, males gave a lower score compared to females. The overall rating suggests that there is a demand for future last-mile automated services that could be integrated with the MaaS concept, although demand changes according to socio-economic and location-based conditions across different countries.
Funder
Interreg Horizon 2020 Framework Programme Chalmers University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Automotive Engineering
Reference29 articles.
1. Ainsalu, J., Arffman, V., Bellone, M., Ellner, M., Haapamäki, T., Haavisto, N., … Åman, M. (2018). State of the art of automated buses. Sustainability, 10(9), 3118–3152. 2. Balbontin, C., Hensher, D. A., Ho, C., & Mulley, C. (2018). Working paper Itls-Wp-18-10. 3. Bansal, P., & Kockelman, K. M. (2018). Are we ready to embrace connected and self-driving vehicles? A case study of Texans. Transportation, 45(2), 641–675 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9745-z. 4. Becker, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2017). Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation, 44(6), 1293–1306 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9808-9. 5. Bellone, M., Ismailogullari, A., Müür, J., Nissin, O., Sell, R., and Soe, R. M. (2020) “Autonomous driving in the real-world: The weather challenge in the Sohjoa Baltic project” towards connected and autonomous vehicle highway: Technical, Security and Ethical Challenges. In EAI/Springer Innovations in Communications and Computing Book series.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|