Abstract
AbstractIn the course of major societal developments such as digitalisation and increasing urbanisation, various forms of so-called new mobility services have emerged. Various disciplines are engaged in understanding these services. However, what is still missing is a comprehensive understanding of what the umbrella term new mobility services means beyond a loosely used catch-all term. This article provides an interdisciplinary overview of the concept of new mobility services and their respective impacts on mobility landscapes. These aspects are summarised using a scoping review approach by examining a total of 98 publications. Our results show that the term new mobility services is indeed an umbrella term for different mobility concepts that are conceptualised differently and whose impacts on mobility landscapes are manifold. However, by applying elements of formal concept analysis, we can identify several key characteristics that define the lowest common denominator for services to be classified as new mobility services.
Funder
Technische Universität Dortmund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference118 articles.
1. Sun, L., Chen, J., Li, Q., & Huang, D. (2020). Dramatic uneven urbanization of large cities throughout the world in recent decades. Nature Communications, 11(1), 5366.
2. Verdini, G. (2017). Planetary urbanisation and the built heritage from a non-western perspective: The question of ‘how’ we should protect the past. Built Heritage, 1, 73–82.
3. Liu, L., Biderman, A., & Ratti, C. (2009). Urban mobility landscape: real time monitoring of urban mobility patterns. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management. Sendai, Japan.
4. Butler, L., Yigitcanlar, T., & Paz, A. (2020). Smart urban mobility innovations: A comprehensive review and evaluation. IEEE Access, 8, 196034–196049.
5. Calderón, F., & Miller, E. J. (2020). A literature review of mobility services: Definitions, modelling state-of-the-art, and key considerations for a conceptual modelling framework. Transport Reviews, 40(3), 312–332.