Author:
Tscherning Sarah Cecilie,Bekker Hilary Louise,Vedelø Tina Wang,Finderup Jeanette,Rodkjær Lotte Ørneborg
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The patients’ and the carers’ roles in health service research has changed from being solely participants in studies to also being active partners and co-designers in the research process. Research carried out with or by patient partners is an increasingly accepted component of health service research in many countries, but how researchers can best approach engaging patient partners in the research process is still not clear. There is a need for guidance to support researchers when engaging patient partners and assess how such engagement impacts on research outputs. The aim of this paper is to present a protocol for a scoping review of published literature on how to engage patient partners effectively in the research process. Investigating this aim implies examining: a) how to engage patient partners in the research process; and b) what impact such engagement has on research outputs. This scoping review protocol is the first to examine how to engage patient partners effectively across different diseases and research areas.
Methods
A scoping review using a systematic process informed by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework will be carried out across six electronic databases using the terms ‘patient participation’, ‘community participation’, ‘research personnel’, ‘patient and public involvement’ and ‘patient partner’. We will include published reviews concerning engagement of patient partners in the research process in healthcare settings, and exclude studies assessing engagement in treatment and healthcare. Two reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts of articles independently for inclusion, and extract data from articles that meet the inclusion criteria. Where there is disagreement, a third reviewer will be consulted to facilitate consensus. The data elicited will include: author and study characteristics; research aims and findings; description of patient engagement in the research process; and assessment impact. Descriptive data and narrative analysis will synthesize findings.
Discussion
To understand how to engage patient partners effectively in the research process, the impact of such engagement must be taken into consideration to give a qualified suggestion for future guidance. We hope this review will raise awareness of which common elements constitute effective engagement of patient partners in the research process.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Health Professions,Health (social science)
Reference25 articles.
1. Greenhalgh T, Hinton L, Finlay T, Macfarlane A, Fahy N, Clyde B, et al. Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: systematic review and co-design pilot. Health Expect. 2019;22(4):785–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12888.
2. Beresford P, Russo J. Patient and public involvement in research. In: Nolte E, Merkur S, Anell A, editors. Achieving person-centred health systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020. p. 149–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108855464.009.
3. INVOLVE: About INVOLVE. https://www.invo.org.uk/about-involve/ (no date). Accessed 2 Dec 2020.
4. Collier R. Federal government unveils patient-oriented research strategy. CMAJ. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3987.
5. International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research: What is the ICPHR - short description. http://www.icphr.org/uploads/2/0/3/9/20399575/what_is_the_icphr_-_short_description_-_version_2014_10_20.pdf (2014). Accessed 2 Dec 2020.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献