Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey

Author:

Nohová Ivana1ORCID,Andrews John2,Votan Bénédicte3,Miller Austin4,Sehouli Jalid5,Berger Regina6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group (CEEGOG) Prague Czech Republic

2. Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG) Camperdown Australia

3. Association de Recherche dans les CAncers Gynécologiques–Groupe d'Investigateurs National pour l'Etude des Cancers de l'Ovaire et du sein (ARCAGY‐GINECO) Paris France

4. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, GOG Foundation Buffalo New York USA

5. Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Nord‐Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie (NOGGO e.V.) Berlin Germany

6. Department for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Österreich (AGO Austria) Innsbruck Austria

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsInvolving patients in research, not only as trial subjects, is not a newly established practice. Over the last two decades, patient roles have gradually expanded to become active research contributors, creating a more patient‐centered research landscape. Our survey has explored the scope of patient involvement within the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG), an International Gynecologic Cancer Research Consortium, and identified challenges in developing a systematic, meaningful and sustainable level of patient involvement.MethodsIn late 2019, the GCIG Harmonisation Operations Committee conducted an online survey across 26 national and/or international research cooperative groups, aiming to identify current patient involvement practices implemented by each group. Twelve questions were asked. The results have been generated to support a systematic strategic planning process to increase patient involvement into clinical research projects.ResultsMore than half of the 26 participating groups have either already involved (15, [58%]) or are planning (6, [23%]) to involve patients in their research activities. Gaining patient support in raising public awareness around clinical trials appears to be one of the most desired benefits (21, [81%]). Ten respondents managed to integrate patient involvement into their standard practice. When involving patients in research the groups mostly consider that patients bring added value to the study (19, [73%]), although only eight groups (40%) have a well‐organized process in doing so.ConclusionEven though patient involvement is considered a significant added value to clinical research, its application within GCIG groups is not considered on a regular basis and is predominantly limited to operational aspects of research activities. The lack of resources and expertize, as well as the missing well‐organized and structured process of some groups, combined with their ability to ensure process sustainability, are among the main factors affecting implementation and adoption of patient involvement within GCIG research activities.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3