Operationalizing the principles of patient engagement through a Patient Advisory Council: Lessons and recommendations

Author:

Nielssen Ingrid12ORCID,Santana Maria12ORCID,Pokharel Surakshya23,Strain Kimberly1,Kiryanova Veronika12,Zelinsky Sandra12,Khawaja Zoha23,Khanna Prachi4,Rychtera Anni5,Ambasta Anshula67ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) Support Unit Edmonton Alberta Canada

2. Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Canada

3. Ward of the 21st Century, Calgary Zone of Alberta Health Services University of Calgary Calgary Canada

4. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada

5. Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) Support Unit Vancouver British Columbia Canada

6. Department of Anesthesia, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Therapeutics Initiative University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada

7. Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundInclusiveness, Support, Mutual Respect and Co‐Build are the four pillars of patient engagement according to the Strategy for Patient‐Oriented Research (SPOR). The aim of this manuscript is to describe the operationalization of these principles through the creation of a Patient Advisory Council (PAC) for the research study titled ‘Re‐Purposing the Ordering of Routine laboratory Tests (RePORT)’.MethodsResearchers collaborated with the Alberta SPOR SUPPORT Unit (AbSPORU) Patient Engagement Team to create a diverse PAC. Recruitment was intentional and included multiple perspectives and experiences. PAC meetings were held monthly, and patient research partners received support to function as co‐chairs of the PAC. Patient research partners were offered training, support and tailored modalities of compensation to actively engage with the PAC. Regular member check‐ins occurred through reflexivity and a formal evaluation of PAC member engagement.ResultsThe PAC included between 9 and 11 patient research partners, principal investigator, research study coordinator, improvement scientist, resident physician and support members from the AbSPORU team. Twelve monthly PAC meetings were held during the first phase of the project. The PAC made course‐changing contributions to study design including study objectives, recruitment poster, interview guide and development of codes for thematic analysis. Patient research partners largely felt that their opinions were valued. Diversity in the PAC membership enhanced access to diverse patient participants. Furthermore, support for co‐chairs and patient research partner members enabled active engagement in research. In addition, a culture of mutual respect facilitated patient partner engagement, and co‐design approaches yielded rich research outputs.ConclusionsCollaboration between research teams and Patient Engagement Teams can promote effective patient engagement through a PAC. Deliberate and flexible strategies are needed to manage the PAC to create an ecology of Inclusiveness, Support, Mutual Respect, and Co‐Build for meaningful patient engagement.Patient or Public ContributionPatient research partners were involved in the decision to write this manuscript and collaborated equitably in the conception and development of this manuscript, including providing critical feedback. Patient research partners were active members of the PAC and informed the research project design, participant recruitment strategies, data collection and analysis, and will be involved in the implementation and dissemination of results. They are currently involved in the co‐development of a patient engagement strategy using a Human‐Centered Design process.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference40 articles.

1. Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co‐design pilot

2. Patient and Public Engagement in Integrated Knowledge Translation Research: Are we there yet?

3. Strategy for patient‐oriented research. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).2022. Accessed October 5 2023.https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41204.html

4. Ethics guidance for developing partnerships with patients and researchers. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).2020. Accessed October 5 2023.https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/51910.html

5. What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams?

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3