Exclusionary Behaviors Reinforce Historical Biases and Contribute to Loss of Talent in the Earth Sciences

Author:

Marin‐Spiotta Erika1ORCID,Diaz‐Vallejo Emily J.1ORCID,Barnes Rebecca T.2ORCID,Mattheis Allison3ORCID,Schneider Blair4ORCID,Berhe Asmeret Asefaw5ORCID,Hastings Meredith G.6ORCID,Williams Billy M.7,Magley Vicki8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geography University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison WI USA

2. Colorado College Environmental Studies Program Colorado Springs CO USA

3. Division of Applied and Advanced Studies California State University Los Angeles CA USA

4. Kansas Geological Survey Lawrence KS USA

5. Department of Life and Environmental Sciences University of California, Merced Merced CA USA

6. Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences Institute at Brown for Environment and Society Brown University Providence RI USA

7. American Geophysical Union Washington DC USA

8. Department of Psychology University of Connecticut Storrs CT USA

Abstract

AbstractGeosciences remain one of the least diverse fields. Efforts to diversify the discipline need to address the role of hostile and exclusionary work and learning environments. A workplace climate survey distributed to five professional organizations illustrates varied experiences of earth and space scientists over a 12‐month period (pre‐COVID). A majority experienced positive interactions in the workplace. However, scientists of color, women and non‐binary individuals, scientists with disabilities, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, pansexual, and asexual (LGBQPA+) scientists more frequently experienced negative interactions, including interpersonal mistreatment, discriminatory language, and sexual harassment. Geoscientists of color were more likely to experience devaluation of their work than white scientists. More than half of women and non‐binary respondents, as well as those who identify as LGBQPA+ experienced identity‐based discriminatory remarks. Disabled geoscientists were more likely to hear negative identity‐based language than those who did not disclose a disability. Overall, 14% of all respondents experienced sexual harassment in the previous year. Rates were greatest for historically excluded groups: non‐binary (51%), LGBQPA+ (33%), disabled (26%), women (20%), and geoscientists of color (17%). A majority of geoscientists reported avoiding their colleagues and almost a third considered leaving their institution or a career change. Historically excluded groups were more likely to report opting out of professional activities with potential career consequences. To address continued exclusion and low retention in the earth and space sciences, recruitment is not enough. We need to create environments that ensure opportunities for all to thrive.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Subject

Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),General Environmental Science

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Repairing the scaffolding: women authors in Paleobiology;Paleobiology;2023-12-07

2. Future of Work at the Intersection of Climate and Equity;Socio-Economic Disparities, Vulnerable Communities, and the Future of Work and Entrepreneurship;2023-06-09

3. Best Practices to Promote Field Science Safety;Integrative And Comparative Biology;2023-04-17

4. Mining for net zero: The impossible task;The Leading Edge;2023-04

5. Historically excluded groups in ecology are undervalued and poorly treated;Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment;2023-03-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3