Occupation Coding During the Interview in a Web-First Sequential Mixed-Mode Survey

Author:

Peycheva Darina N.1,Sakshaug Joseph W.2,Calderwood Lisa1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Institute of Education , 55–59 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0NT, United Kingdom .

2. Institute for Employment Research , 104 Regensburger Straße, Nuremberg 90478 , Germany .

Abstract

Abstract Coding respondent occupation is one of the most challenging aspects of survey data collection. Traditionally performed manually by office coders post-interview, previous research has acknowledged the advantages of coding occupation during the interview, including reducing costs, processing time and coding uncertainties that are more difficult to address post-interview. However, a number of concerns have been raised as well, including the potential for interviewer effects, the challenge of implementing the coding system in a web survey, in which respondents perform the coding procedure themselves, or the feasibility of implementing the same standardized coding system in a mixed-mode self- and interviewer-administered survey. This study sheds light on these issues by presenting an evaluation of a new occupation coding method administered during the interview in a large-scale sequential mixed-mode (web, telephone, face-to-face) cohort study of young adults in the UK. Specifically, we assess the take-up rates of this new coding method across the different modes and report on several other performance measures thought to impact the quality of the collected occupation data. Furthermore, we identify factors that affect the coding of occupation during the interview, including interviewer effects. The results carry several implications for survey practice and directions for future research.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference31 articles.

1. Belloni, M., A. Brugiavini, E. Meschi, and K. Tijdens. 2016. “Measuring and detecting errors in occupational coding: an analysis of SHARE data.” Journal of Official Statistics, 32(4): 917–945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2016-0049.10.1515/jos-2016-0049

2. Bergmann, M.M., and D. Joye. 2005. “Comparing Social Stratification Schemata: CAMSIS, CSP-CH, Goldthorpe, ISCO-88, Treiman, and Wright.” Cambridge Studies in Social Research 10: 1–35. Available at: https://www.sociology.cam.ac.uk/system/-files/documents/cs10.pdf (accessed October 2019).

3. Brugiavini, A., M. Belloni, R.E. Buia, and M. Martens. 2017. The “Job Coder”. In SHARE Wave 6: Panel innovations and collecting Dried Blood Spots. Edited by F. Malter and A. Börsch-Supan. Munich: MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy: 51–70. Available at: http://www.share-project.org/uploads/tx_sharepublications/201804_SHARE-WAVE-6_MFRB.pdf (accessed October 2019).

4. Burstyn, I., A. Slutsky, D.G. Lee, A.B. Singer, Y. An, and Y.L. Michael. 2014. “Beyond Crosswalks: Reliability of Exposure Assessment Following Automated Coding of FreeText Job Descriptions for Occupational Epidemiology.” The Annals of Occupational Hygiene 58(4): 482–492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meu006.10.1093/annhyg/meu006

5. Campanelli, P., K. Thompson, N. Moon, and T. Staples. 1997. “The Quality of Occupational Coding in the United Kingdom.” In Survey Measurement and Process Quality. Edited by L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. De Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin: 437–453. New York: Wiley.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3