Reducing Nonresponse and Data Linkage Consent Bias in Large-Scale Panel Surveys

Author:

Sakshaug Joseph W.123

Affiliation:

1. University of Warwick , Coventry , UK

2. German Institute for Employment Research , Nuremberg , Germany

3. Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich , Munich , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Selection bias is an ongoing concern in large-scale panel surveys where the cumulative effects of unit nonresponse increase at each subsequent wave of data collection. A second source of selection bias in panel studies is the inability to link respondents to supplementary administrative records, either because respondents do not consent to link or the matching algorithm fails to locate their administrative records. Both sources of selection bias can affect the validity of conclusions drawn from these data sources. In this article, I discuss recently proposed methods of reducing both sources of selection bias in panel studies, with a special emphasis on reducing selection bias in the US Health and Retirement Study.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Health Policy,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Reference35 articles.

1. Bee, C. A., G. Gathright, and B. D. Meyer. 2015. “Bias from Unit Non-Response in the Measurement of Income in Household Surveys.” In Paper Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings of the American Statistical Association. Also available at https://harris.uchicago.edu/files/jsm2015_bgm_unit_non-response_in_cps.pdf.

2. Büttner, T. J. M., J. W. Sakshaug, and B. Vicari. 2021. “Evaluating the Utility of Linked Administrative Data for Nonresponse Bias Adjustment in a Piggyback Longitudinal Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 37 (4): 837–64, https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2021-0037.

3. Davis-Kean, P., R. Chambers, L. L. Davidson, C. Kleinert, Q. Ren, and S. Tang. 2018. Longitudinal Studies Strategic Review: 2017 Report to the Economic and Social Research Council. Also available at https://esrc.ukri.org/files/news-events-and-publications/publications/longitudinal-studies-strategicreview-2017.

4. Gessendorfer, J., J. Beste, J. Drechsler, and J. W. Sakshaug. 2018. “Statistical Matching as a Supplement to Record Linkage of Survey and Administrative Data: A Valuable Method to Tackle Non-Consent Bias?” Journal of Official Statistics 34 (4): 909–33, https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0045.

5. Groves, R. M. 2006. “Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70 (5): 646–75, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl033.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3