Affiliation:
1. University Children’s Hospital , Skopje , N Macedonia
2. Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering , Skopje , N Macedonia
3. Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences , Zagreb , Croatia
4. Univniversity of Hertfordshire , Hatfield , UK
5. Bet Issie Shapiro , Amutat Avi-Ra’anana , Israel
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a group of complex lifelong neurodevelopmental disorders, characterized by difficulties in social communication and stereotyped behaviours. Due to the increasing number of children with ASD, it is important to continue developing interventions as well as invent new ones. Human-robot interaction can contribute to better outcomes for these children. There are several robots such as Nao, Kaspar, ZENO, Probo, ZECA, etc. which are used in autism interventions. Many mobile and web applications are in constant growth, too. They target skills such as collaboration, social skills, language skills, social competence, and communication.
Aim: To explore the usability of the humanoid robot Kaspar and a complementary app in interventions of children with ASD.
Sample: 20 children with ASD, aged between 23 and 76 months old.
Method: As an added intervention for this group of children, we used the robot Kaspar and its complementary app. Kaspar is a child-sized humanoid robot that uses bodily expressions, facial expressions, gestures, and pre-recorded speech to interact with a human.
Results: This intervention achieved certain positive shifts in eight of the eleven measured developmental domains, such as communication functions and means, turn taking, imitation, language skills, play, attention and daily life skills. The three categories that had inconsiderable improvement are vocalization and speech, cause and effect and coping skills.
Conclusion: Based on the measurements before and after the use of Kaspar and its complementary app, there is improvement, primarily in the domains of language, imitation and communication skills and attention.
Reference21 articles.
1. 1. Chiarotti F, Venerosi A. Epidemiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review of Worldwide Prevalence Estimates Since 2014, Brain Sci. 2020; 10(5): 274.
2. 2. Steinbrenner JR, Hume K, Odom SL, Morin KL, Nowell SW, Tomaszewski B, Szendrey S, McIntyre NS, Yücesoy-Özkan, Ş, Savage MN. Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team. 2020.
3. 3. Randolph, MA. Findings and conclusions: National standards project, phase 2. National Autism Center. 2015.
4. 4. Robins B. Dautenhahn K. Dubowski J. Robots as Isolators or Mediators for Children with Autism: A Cautionary Tale. Proceedings of AISB'05 Symposium on Robot Companions Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Human-Robot Interaction. 2005
5. 5. Zorcec T, Robins B, Dautenhahn K. Getting Engaged: Assisted Play with a Humanoid Robot Kaspar for Children with Severe Autism. ICT Innovations Communications in Computer and Information Science. 2018, 940; 198-207.10.1007/978-3-030-00825-3_17
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献