Conceptual Origins of Legal Linguistics

Author:

Galdia Marcus1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Dr. phil., Dr. iur., Associate Professor of Law International University of Monaco 14 , rue Hubert Clérissi MC 98000 Monaco

Abstract

Abstract This essay is a survey of methods applied and topics scrutinized in legal-linguistic studies. It starts with the elucidation of the epistemic interest that led to the emergence and to the subsequent expansion of the mainstream legal-linguistic knowledge that we dispose of today. Thus, the essay focuses upon the development of problem awareness in the emerging legal-linguistic studies as well as upon the results of research that might be perceived as the state of the art in the mainstream legal linguistics. Meanwhile, some methodologically innovative tilts and twists that enrich and inspire contemporary legal linguistics are considered as well. Essentially, this essay traces the conceptual landscape in which the paradigms of legal-linguistic studies came about. This conceptual landscape extends from the research into the isolated words of law and the style used by jurists to the scrutiny of legal texts and legal discourses in all their socio-linguistic complexity. Within this broad frame of reference, many achievements in legal-linguistic studies are mentioned in order to sketch the consequences of processes in which legal-linguistic paradigms take shape. The author concludes upon a vision of legal linguistics called pragmatic legal linguistics as the newest stage in the intellectual enterprise that aims to pierce the language of the law and by so doing to understand law better.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference80 articles.

1. In the references, only publications concerning general aspects of legal linguistics are listed. Literature concerning specific legal-linguistic issues is provided in Additional materials mentioned in footnotes.

2. Aarnio, Aulis. 1987. The Rational as Reasonable: A Treatise on Legal Justification. Dordrecht: Reidel.

3. Andruszkiewicz, Marta. 2016. On Some of the Aspects of the Linguistic Theory of Law. Studies in Logic, Grammar, and Rhetoric vol. 49: 221–229.

4. Cao, Deborah. 2004. Chinese Law. A Language Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.

5. Cornu, Gérard. 2005. Linguistique juridique. 3d ed. Paris: Montchrestien.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Olimpia G. Loddo: Intersemiotic Legal Translation;International Journal of Legal Discourse;2024-04-01

2. FOUNDATIONS OF PRAGMATIC LEGAL LINGUISTICS;Comparative Legilinguistics;2022-11-07

3. Some Desiderata in Teaching Scientific And Legal LSP in Modern Greek: The Case of Loanwords;Mìžnarodnij fìlologìčnij časopis;2022

4. Preface: Law and Legal Linguistics in a Constant State of Transition;Comparative Legilinguistics;2021-09-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3