Affiliation:
1. al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Abstract
The author analyzes how the modern education system contributes to the formation of socio-economically determined choice of higher education, where the latter includes a decision on continue studying, choosing a university and specialty.The functioning of the higher education system is analyzed in the context of the interconnections of education, the labor market and family resources, which reflect the movement of human capital and current trends in social mobility in Central Asia, as exemplified by Kazakhstan.The article presents data from a study conducted among young professionals aged 21 to 29 years with a different level of education. The sample represents the Republic of Kazakhstan and amounts to 1000 respondents. The survey was conducted using the technique of personal formalized interviews at the respondents’ work place.The data obtained indicate that the expansion of accessibility of higher education in Kazakhstan is accompanied by its stratification, which is projected in the inequality in the labor market for young people with a different «background» of family capital. This trend is hidden. The family’s resource capital affects the range of choice of educational trajectory (level of education, university, specialty), in the future, the level of education and prestige of a young specialist’s university determine career opportunities.
Publisher
Moscow Polytechnic University
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Education
Reference28 articles.
1. Shnarbekova, M.K. (2018). The Effects of Family Capital on Kazakh Youth Strategies in the Choice of Higher Education. Integratsi-ya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. Vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 712-727, doi: 10.15507/1991-9468.093.022.201804.712-727 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
2. Zborovsky, G.E., Ambarova, P.A. (2020). The Formation and Development of Foreign Sociology of Higher Education: A Review. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 33-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-33-50 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Bathmaker, A.-M. (2015). Thinking with Bour-dieu: Thinking after Bourdieu. Using ‘Field’ to Consider Inequalities in the Changing Field of English Higher Education. Cambridge Journal of Education. Vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 61-80, doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2014.988683
4. Jackson, M., Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, H.J., Yaish, M. (2007). Primary and Secondary Effects in Class Differentials in Educational Attainment: The Transition to A-Level Courses in England and Wales. Acta Sociologica. Vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 211-229. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20459999 (accessed 21.02.2021).
5. Breen, R., Goldthorpe, J.H. (1997). Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory. Rationality and Society. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 275-305, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/104346397009003002
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献