Application of Human Factors Methods to Understand Missed Follow-up of Abnormal Test Results

Author:

Rogith Deevakar1,Satterly Tyler23,Singh Hardeep23,Sittig Dean F.14,Russo Elise5,Smith Michael W.6,Roosan Don7,Bhise Viraj8,Murphy Daniel R.23

Affiliation:

1. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, Texas, United States

2. Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, United States

3. Department of Medicine, Section of Health Services Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States

4. UT-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Houston, Texas, United States

5. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States

6. Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de las Americas Puebla, Cholula, Mexico

7. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, College of Pharmacy Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California, United States

8. Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study demonstrates application of human factors methods for understanding causes for lack of timely follow-up of abnormal test results (“missed results”) in outpatient settings. Methods We identified 30 cases of missed test results by querying electronic health record data, developed a critical decision method (CDM)-based interview guide to understand decision-making processes, and interviewed physicians who ordered these tests. We analyzed transcribed responses using a contextual inquiry (CI)-based methodology to identify contextual factors contributing to missed results. We then developed a CI-based flow model and conducted a fault tree analysis (FTA) to identify hierarchical relationships between factors that delayed action. Results The flow model highlighted barriers in information flow and decision making, and the hierarchical model identified relationships between contributing factors for delayed action. Key findings including underdeveloped methods to track follow-up, as well as mismatches, in communication channels, timeframes, and expectations between patients and physicians. Conclusion This case report illustrates how human factors–based approaches can enable analysis of contributing factors that lead to missed results, thus informing development of preventive strategies to address them.

Funder

Agency for Health Care Research and Quality

Houston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Mentored Career Development Award

VA Health Services Research and Development Service

VA National Center for Patient Safety

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3