Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide in Newly Diagnosed O6-Methylguanine–DNA Methyltransferase Nonmethylated Glioblastoma: The Randomized GLARIUS Trial
-
Published:2016-05-10
Issue:14
Volume:34
Page:1611-1619
-
ISSN:0732-183X
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCO
Author:
Herrlinger Ulrich1, Schäfer Niklas1, Steinbach Joachim P.1, Weyerbrock Astrid1, Hau Peter1, Goldbrunner Roland1, Friedrich Franziska1, Rohde Veit1, Ringel Florian1, Schlegel Uwe1, Sabel Michael1, Ronellenfitsch Michael W.1, Uhl Martin1, Maciaczyk Jaroslaw1, Grau Stefan1, Schnell Oliver1, Hänel Mathias1, Krex Dietmar1, Vajkoczy Peter1, Gerlach Rüdiger1, Kortmann Rolf-Dieter1, Mehdorn Maximilian1, Tüttenberg Jochen1, Mayer-Steinacker Regine1, Fietkau Rainer1, Brehmer Stefanie1, Mack Frederic1, Stuplich Moritz1, Kebir Sied1, Kohnen Ralf1, Dunkl Elmar1, Leutgeb Barbara1, Proescholdt Martin1, Pietsch Torsten1, Urbach Horst1, Belka Claus1, Stummer Walter1, Glas Martin1
Affiliation:
1. Ulrich Herrlinger, Niklas Schäfer, Frederic Mack, Moritz Stuplich, Sied Kebir, Torsten Pietsch, and Martin Glas, University of Bonn, Bonn; Joachim P. Steinbach and Michael W. Ronellenfitsch, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt; Astrid Weyerbrock and Horst Urbach, University of Freiburg, Freiburg; Peter Hau and Martin Uhl, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg; Roland Goldbrunner and Stefan Grau, University of Cologne, Cologne; Franziska Friedrich and Rolf-Dieter Kortmann, University of Leipzig,...
Abstract
Purpose In patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma that harbors a nonmethylated O6-methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase promotor, standard temozolomide (TMZ) has, at best, limited efficacy. The GLARIUS trial thus explored bevacizumab plus irinotecan (BEV+IRI) as an alternative to TMZ. Patients and Methods In this phase II, unblinded trial 182 patients in 22 centers were randomly assigned 2:1 to BEV (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) during radiotherapy (RT) followed by maintenance BEV (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus IRI(125 mg/m2 every 2 weeks) or to daily TMZ (75 mg/m2) during RT followed by six courses of TMZ (150-200 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 4 weeks). The primary end point was the progression-free survival rate after 6 months (PFS-6). Results In the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population, PFS-6 was increased from 42.6% with TMZ (95% CI, 29.4% to 55.8%) to 79.3% with BEV+IRI (95% CI, 71.9% to 86.7%; P <.001). PFS was prolonged from a median of 5.99 months (95% CI, 2.7 to 7.3 months) to 9.7 months (95% CI, 8.7 to 10.8 months; P < .001). At progression, crossover BEV therapy was given to 81.8% of all patients who received any sort of second-line therapy in the TMZ arm. Overall survival (OS) was not different in the two arms: the median OS was 16.6 months (95% CI, 15.4 to 18.4 months) with BEV+IRI and was 17.5 months (95% CI, 15.1 to 20.5 months) with TMZ. The time course of quality of life (QOL) in six selected domains of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (QLQ) –C30 and QLQ-BN20 (which included cognitive functioning), of the Karnofsky performance score, and of the Mini Mental State Examination score was not different between the treatment arms. Conclusion BEV+IRI resulted in a superior PFS-6 rate and median PFS compared with TMZ. However, BEV+IRI did not improve OS, potentially because of the high crossover rate. BEV+IRI did not alter QOL compared with TMZ.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Cited by
157 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|