The tip of the iceberg in organic chemistry classes: how do students deal with the invisible?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The tip of the iceberg in organic chemistry classes: how do students deal with the invisible?

Published:2015 Issue:1 Volume:16 Page:9-21
ISSN:1109-4028
Container-title:Chemistry Education Research and Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.

Author:

Graulich Nicole¹²³⁴

Affiliation:

1. Justus-Liebig University Giessen

2. Institute of Chemistry Education

3. 35392 Giessen

4. Germany

Abstract

Organic chemistry education is one of the youngest research areas among all chemistry related research efforts, and its published scholarly work has become vibrant and diverse over the last 15 years. Research on problem-solving behavior, students' use of the arrow-pushing formalism, the investigation of students' conceptual knowledge and their cognitive skills have shaped our understanding of college students' understanding in organic chemistry classes. This review provides an overview of research efforts focusing on student's perspectives and summarizes the main results and pending questions that may guide subsequent research activities.

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Subject

Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Link

http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2015/RP/C4RP00165F

Reference68 articles.

1. Anderson T. L. and Bodner G. M., (2008), What can we do about ‘Parker’? A case study of a good student who didn't ‘get’ organic chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, 93–101

2. Becker N. M. and Cooper M. M., (2014), College chemistry students' understanding of potential energy in the context of atomic–molecular interactions, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 51, 789–808

3. Bhattacharyya G., (2006), Practitioner development in organic chemistry: how graduate students conceptualize organic acids, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 7, 240–247

4. Bhattacharyya G., (2008), Who am I? What am I doing here? Professional identity and the epistemic development of organic chemists, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, 84–92

5. Bhattacharyya G., (2014), Trials and tribulations: student approaches and difficulties with proposing mechanisms using the electron-pushing formalism, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 15, 594–609

Cited by 112 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Thinking and Learning in Nested Systems: The Individual Level;Journal of Chemical Education;2024-01-19

2. Student perceptions of partial charges and nucleophilicity/electrophilicity when provided with either a bond-line, ball-and-stick, or electrostatic potential map for molecular representation;Chemistry Education Research and Practice;2024

3. The evolution of an assignment: how a Writing-to-Learn assignment's design shapes organic chemistry students’ elaborations on reaction mechanisms;Chemistry Education Research and Practice;2024

4. Analysis of resources applied to rationalize elimination mechanisms;Chemistry Education Research and Practice;2024

5. Chinese pre-service chemistry teachers’ perception of augmented reality-assisted secondary chemistry learning;Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research;2023-12-08