Exploring relationships that college instructors seek to build with intention in chemistry classrooms

Author:

Moreira Patricia1ORCID,Talanquer Vicente1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

Abstract

Teaching is a complex activity that demands paying attention to diverse components and relationships that affect the learning process, and acting with intentionality to build and nurture those connections. In this qualitative research study, we proposed and used an intentional–relational framework to explore differences in the relationships that four general chemistry instructors sought and acted to build with intention in their classes. Our goal was not to evaluate the quality of instruction but rather to characterize instructors’ practices to gain insight into educational relationships that may affect student performance. All instructors in our sample manifested a strong interest in helping students succeed in their studies and relied on a variety of resources designed and integrated into their courses to support student learning. They mostly differed in the extent to which they attended and responded to contextual issues, intentionally seeking to make content relevant to students, helping them build connections between their interests and the discipline, and adapting resources to create more inclusive learning environments. These differences seem to affect student performance in common exams. Our study highlights the importance of analyzing the relationships that instructors build with intention to support professional development and teacher reflection, and better understand the impact of instructors’ decisions on student performance.

Funder

Division of Undergraduate Education

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Subject

Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Reference61 articles.

1. Anderson T., (2004), Towards a theory of online learning in Anderson T. (ed.), The theory and practice of online learning Edmonton , CA: AU Press, pp. 45–74

2. Andrews S. E., Keating J., Corbo J. C., Mark G., Reinholz D. L. and Finkelstein N., (2020), Transforming teaching evaluation in disciplines: a model and case study of departmental change, in White K., Beach A., Finkelstein N., Henderson C., Simkins S., Slakey L., Stains M., Weaver G. and Whitehead L. (ed.), Transforming institutions: Accelerating systemic change in higher education , Pressbooks, ch. 13 , pp. 189–204

3. Artze-Vega I., Darby F., Dewsbury B. and Imad M., (2023), The norton guide to equity-minded teaching , New York: W. W. Norton

4. Asgari M., Miles A. M., Lisboa M. S. and Sarvary M. A., (2021), Copus, portaal, or dart? Classroom observation tool comparison from the instructor user's perspective, Front. Educ ., 6

5. Ausubel D. P., (2000), The acquisition and retention of knowledge , Dordrecht: Kluwer

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3