An explanative basis for the differential performance of students with low math aptitude in general chemistry

Author:

Ralph Vanessa R.123ORCID,Lewis Scott E.123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemistry

2. University of South Florida

3. USA

Abstract

Students who score within the bottom quartile on cognitive measures of math aptitude have been identified as at-risk for low performance in chemistry courses, with less attention as to why such differential performance persists. At-risk students struggle most differentially on assessment items related to the mole concept and stoichiometry. An exploration as to the nature of the differential performance observed became of great interest as the assessment of these topics rarely progresses beyond multiplication or division, and at-risk students who achieved proficiency with the mole concept and stoichiometry had no noticeable gaps in academic chemistry performance when compared to students scoring in the top three quartiles of math aptitude. Thus, students in first-semester general chemistry were surveyed to describe their solution processes toward assessment items involving the mole concept and stoichiometry. Three hundred and forty-eight students responded to all survey prompts with 101 identified as at-risk. Findings suggest that while all students were observed to struggle in the conceptualization of the algorithms by which they execute solution processes, not-at-risk chemistry students were more likely to achieve correct answers via chemically implausible solution pathways. Rather than suggest the removal of assessment practices involving algorithmic, multiple-choice assessment on these topics, the implications include practical suggestions and opportunities for further research toward improving the equitability of measures used to assess proficiency with stoichiometry.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Subject

Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Reference49 articles.

1. Andrews M. H. and Andrews L. J., (1979), First-year chemistry grades and SAT-M scores, J. Chem. Educ. , 56 (4), 231–232, 10.1021/ed056p231

2. Ayala C. C., (2002), On the cognitive validity of science performance assessments , Stanford University, [WWW Document]. URL https://search.proquest.com/docview/305523863?accountid=14745%0A (accessed 1.12.19)

3. Bender D. S. and Milakofsky L., (1982), College chemistry and Piaget: the relationship of aptitude and achievement measures, J. Res. Sci. Teach. , 19 (3), 205–216 10.1002/tea.3660190303

4. Bialek W. and Botstein D., (2004), Introductory science and mathematics education for 21st-century biologists, Science , 303 (5659), 788–790, 10.1126/science.1095480

5. BouJaoude S. and Barakat H., (2003), Students’ problem solving strategies in stoichiometry and their relationships to conceptual understanding and learning approaches, Electron. J. Sci. Educ. , 7 (3), 42, [WWW Document], URL http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7709/5476 (accessed 11.13.18)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3