Affiliation:
1. University of South Florida Tampa Campus, Chemistry, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa, Florida, CHE205, USA
Abstract
Representations in chemistry are the tools by which students, instructors, and chemists reason with chemical concepts that are abstract. Although representations are regularly used within the chemistry classroom, there is more to uncover regarding the ways students interact with representations when given chemistry tasks. This study aimed to address this gap in knowledge. In this study, eighteen students enrolled in second semester general chemistry were recruited for data collection. Semi-structured interviews were utilized to observe how students approached a similar set of dipole–dipole interaction tasks when given four distinct representations. Analysis of the data revealed that students’ approaches to these tasks were affected by the newly explicit features present within each representation. Additionally, the ordering in which the representations were presented to the students influenced the specific features students took notice of and implemented into their approaches to the tasks. These findings can better inform instruction and future research involving chemical representations such that students will form a solid foundation in working with and pulling relevant information from various representations when solving chemistry tasks.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Reference48 articles.
1. Becker N., Noyes K. and Cooper M., (2016), Characterizing students’ mechanistic reasoning about London dispersion forces, J. Chem. Educ. , 93 (10), 1713–1724
2. Bergqvist A. and Chang Rundgren S. N., (2017), The influence of textbooks on teachers’ knowledge of chemical bonding representations relative to students’ difficulties understanding, Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. , 35 (2), 215–237
3. Bodner G. M. and Domin, D. S., (2000), Mental models: The role of representations in problem solving in Chemistry, Univ. Chem. Educ. , 4 (1), 24–30
4. Chittleborough G. and Treagust D. F., (2007), The modelling ability of non-major chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. , 8 , 274–292
5. Cook M. Wiebe E. N. and Carter G., (2008), The influence of prior knowledge on viewing and interpreting graphics with macroscopic and molecular representations, Sci. Educ. , 92 (5), 848–867
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献