Abstract
AbstractInjustices are prevalent in food systems, where the accumulation of vast wealth is possible for a few, yet one in ten people remain hungry. Here, for 194 countries we combine aquatic food production, distribution and consumption data with corresponding national policy documents and, drawing on theories of social justice, explore whether barriers to participation explain unequal distributions of benefits. Using Bayesian models, we find economic and political barriers are associated with lower wealth-based benefits; countries produce and consume less when wealth, formal education and voice and accountability are lacking. In contrast, social barriers are associated with lower welfare-based benefits; aquatic foods are less affordable where gender inequality is greater. Our analyses of policy documents reveal a frequent failure to address political and gender-based barriers. However, policies linked to more just food system outcomes centre principles of human rights, specify inclusive decision-making processes and identify and challenge drivers of injustice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology,Food Science
Reference56 articles.
1. McMichael, P. in New Directions in the Sociology of Global Development (eds Buttel, F. H. & McMichael, P. D.) 265–299 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2005).
2. Clapp, J. The problem with growing corporate concentration and power in the global food system. Nat. Food 2, 404–408 (2021).
3. Webb, P. et al. The urgency of food system transformation is now irrefutable. Nat. Food 1, 584–585 (2020).
4. Global Nutrition Report: Action on Equity to End Malnutrition (Global Nutrition Report, 2020).
5. Love, D. C. et al. Emerging COVID-19 impacts, responses and lessons for building resilience in the seafood system. Glob. Food Sec. 28, 100494 (2021).
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献