Abstract
AbstractIn this study, we examined students’ natural studying behaviors in massive, open, online course (MOOC) on introductory psychology. We found that, overall, distributing study across multiple sessions—increasing spacing—was related to increased performance on end-of-unit quizzes, even when comparing the same student across different time-points in the course. Moreover, we found important variation on who is more likely to engage in spaced study and benefit from it. Students with higher ability and students who were more likely to complete course activities were more likely to space their study. Spacing benefits, however, were largest for the lower-ability students and for those students who were less likely to complete activities. These results suggest that spaced study might work as a buffer, improving performance for low ability students and those who do not engage in active practices. This study highlights the positive impact of spacing in real-world learning situations, but more importantly, the role of self-regulated learning decisions in shaping the impact of spaced practice.
Funder
Gouvernement du Canada | Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Medicine,General Chemistry
Reference52 articles.
1. Thorndike, E. L. The curve of work. Psychol. Rev. 19, 165–194 (1912).
2. Ebbinghaus, H. Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. (Teachers College, Columbia University, 1913).
3. Jost, A. Die Assoziationsfestigkeit in ihrer Abhängigkeit von der Verteilung der Wiederholungen. (Leopold Voss, 1897).
4. Carpenter, S. K. in Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference 465–485 (Elsevier, 2017).
5. Carpenter, S. K. Testing enhances the transfer of learning. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 21, 279–283 (2012).
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献