Author:
Hart Elizabeth H.,Christofides Sarah R.,Davies Teri E.,Rees Stevens Pauline,Creevey Christopher J.,Müller Carsten T.,Rogers Hilary J.,Kingston-Smith Alison H.
Abstract
AbstractWith an increasing human population access to ruminant products is an important factor in global food supply. While ruminants contribute to climate change, climate change could also affect ruminant production. Here we investigated how the plant response to climate change affects forage quality and subsequent rumen fermentation. Models of near future climate change (2050) predict increases in temperature, CO2, precipitation and altered weather systems which will produce stress responses in field crops. We hypothesised that pre-exposure to altered climate conditions causes compositional changes and also primes plant cells such that their post-ingestion metabolic response to the rumen is altered. This “stress memory” effect was investigated by screening ten forage grass varieties in five differing climate scenarios, including current climate (2020), future climate (2050), or future climate plus flooding, drought or heat shock. While varietal differences in fermentation were detected in terms of gas production, there was little effect of elevated temperature or CO2 compared with controls (2020). All varieties consistently showed decreased digestibility linked to decreased methane production as a result of drought or an acute flood treatment. These results indicate that efforts to breed future forage varieties should target tolerance of acute stress rather than long term climate.
Funder
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference114 articles.
1. FAO (1997) Livestock & the Environment—Meeting the challenge, 7th edn. FAO
2. Kingston-Smith AH, Davies TE, Rees Stevens P, Mur LAJ (2013) Comparative Metabolite fingerprinting of the rumen system during colonisation of three forage grass (Lolium perenne L.) varieties. PLoS One1 8:e828012013
3. Smith MR, Myers SS (2018) Impact of anthropogenic CO2 emissions on global human nutrition. Nat. Clim. Change 8:834–839
4. Murphy JM, Brown S, Fung F (2020) UKCP Factsheet: Probabilistic Projections of Climate Extremes. Met Office
5. Loka D et al (2019) Impacts of abiotic stresses on the physiology and metabolism of cool-season grasses: A review. Food Energy Secur. 8:e00152
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献