Abstract
AbstractIn recent years, interest in studying the climate and environmental impact of organic food has grown. Here, we compared the environmental impacts of organic and conventional food using data from 100 life cycle assessment studies. Most studies focused on climate impacts, with fewer addressing biodiversity loss and ecotoxicity. Findings revealed no significant differences in global warming, eutrophication potential, and energy use per mass unit. However, organic food showed lower global warming, eutrophication potential, and energy use per area unit, with higher land use. Additionally, organic farming showed lower potential for biodiversity loss and ecotoxicity. Challenges in life cycle assessment include evaluating biodiversity, toxicity, soil quality, and carbon changes. The choice of functional units influences results, highlighting the importance of considering multiple units in assessing organic food’s environmental footprint. This study emphasizes the necessity for comprehensive assessments at both product and diet levels to support informed decisions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference167 articles.
1. Eyhorn, F. et al. Sustainability in global agriculture driven by organic farming. Nat. Sustain. 2, 253–255 (2019).
2. Willett, W. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).
3. Paull, J. From France to the World: The International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). J. Social Res. Policy 1 (2010).
4. Gerbens-Leenes, P. W., Nonhebel, S. & Krol, M. S. Food consumption patterns and economic growth. Increasing affluence and the use of natural resources. Appetite 55, 597–608 (2010).
5. Olesen, J. E. & Bindi, M. Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. Eur. J. Agronomy 16, 239–262 (2002).