Impact of enhanced geothermal systems on US energy supply in the twenty-first century

Author:

Tester Jefferson W1,Anderson Brian J1,Batchelor Anthony S1,Blackwell David D1,DiPippo Ronald1,Drake Elisabeth M1,Garnish John1,Livesay Bill1,Moore Michal C1,Nichols Kenneth1,Petty Susan1,Nafi Toksoz M1,Veatch Ralph W1,Baria Roy1,Augustine Chad1,Murphy Enda1,Negraru Petru1,Richards Maria1

Affiliation:

1. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge, MA 02139-4307, USA

Abstract

Recent national focus on the value of increasing US supplies of indigenous renewable energy underscores the need for re-evaluating all alternatives, particularly those that are large and well distributed nationally. A panel was assembled in September 2005 to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of geothermal becoming a major supplier of primary energy for US base-load generation capacity by 2050. Primary energy produced from both conventional hydrothermal and enhanced (or engineered) geothermal systems (EGS) was considered on a national scale. This paper summarizes the work of the panel which appears in complete form in a 2006 MIT report, ‘The future of geothermal energy’ parts 1 and 2. In the analysis, a comprehensive national assessment of US geothermal resources, evaluation of drilling and reservoir technologies and economic modelling was carried out. The methodologies employed to estimate geologic heat flow for a range of geothermal resources were utilized to provide detailed quantitative projections of the EGS resource base for the USA. Thirty years of field testing worldwide was evaluated to identify the remaining technology needs with respect to drilling and completing wells, stimulating EGS reservoirs and converting geothermal heat to electricity in surface power and energy recovery systems. Economic modelling was used to develop long-term projections of EGS in the USA for supplying electricity and thermal energy. Sensitivities to capital costs for drilling, stimulation and power plant construction, and financial factors, learning curve estimates, and uncertainties and risks were considered.

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Mathematics

Reference16 articles.

1. American Petroleum Institute (API) 2006 Joint association survey on drilling costs (1976–2004). Washington DC.

2. Armstead H.C.H& Tester J.W Heat mining. 1987 London UK:E. and F.N. Spon.

3. Blackwell D. D. & Richards. M. 2004 Geothermal map of North America . Amer. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Tulsa OK 1 sheet scale 1:6 500 000.

4. Bodvarsson G. & Hanson J. M. Forced geoheat extraction from sheet-like fluid conductors. In Proc. Second NATO-CCMS Information Meeting on dry hot rock geothermal energy . Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-7021:85.

5. Brown D.W. 2000 A hot dry rock geothermal energy concept utilizing supercritical CO 2 instead of water. Proc. Twenty-Fifth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University Stanford CA 24–26 January 2000 paper SGP-TR-165.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3