Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time?

Author:

Kriegler Elmar1ORCID,Luderer Gunnar1,Bauer Nico1ORCID,Baumstark Lavinia1,Fujimori Shinichiro2ORCID,Popp Alexander1,Rogelj Joeri34ORCID,Strefler Jessica1ORCID,van Vuuren Detlef P.56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany

2. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan

3. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria

4. Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

5. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, The Netherlands

6. Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

We explore the feasibility of limiting global warming to 1.5°C without overshoot and without the deployment of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies. For this purpose, we perform a sensitivity analysis of four generic emissions reduction measures to identify a lower bound on future CO 2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes. Final energy demand reductions and electrification of energy end uses as well as decarbonization of electricity and non-electric energy supply are all considered. We find the lower bound of cumulative fossil fuel and industry CO 2 emissions to be 570 GtCO 2 for the period 2016–2100, around 250 GtCO 2 lower than the lower end of available 1.5°C mitigation pathways generated with integrated assessment models. Estimates of 1.5°C-consistent CO 2 budgets are highly uncertain and range between 100 and 900 GtCO 2 from 2016 onwards. Based on our sensitivity analysis, limiting warming to 1.5°C will require CDR or terrestrial net carbon uptake if 1.5°C-consistent budgets are smaller than 650 GtCO 2 . The earlier CDR is deployed, the more it neutralizes post-2020 emissions rather than producing net negative emissions. Nevertheless, if the 1.5°C budget is smaller than 550 GtCO 2 , temporary overshoot of the 1.5°C limit becomes unavoidable if CDR cannot be ramped up faster than to 4 GtCO 2 in 2040 and 10 GtCO 2 in 2050. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The Paris Agreement: understanding the physical and social challenges for a warming world of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels’.

Funder

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

German Research Foundation (DFG) Priority Programme

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme

JSPS KAKENHI

Environment Research and Technology Development Fund

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Mathematics

Reference59 articles.

1. Clarke LE et al. 2014 Assessing transformation pathways. In Climate change 2014 mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change pp. 413–510. Geneva Switzerland: IPCC.

2. UNEP. 2016 The Emissions Gap Report 2016 86. See https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/emissions-gap-report.

3. Perspective : paris agreement climate proposals need boost to keep warming well below 2°C;Rogelj J;Nat. Clim. Chang.,2016

4. What would it take to achieve the Paris temperature targets?

5. Constraints on global temperature target overshoot

Cited by 89 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3