Field emission: calculations supporting a new methodology of comparing theory with experiment

Author:

Filippov Sergey V.1,Kolosko Anatoly G.1,Popov Eugeni O.1,Forbes Richard G.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Plasma Physics, Atomic Physics and Astrophysics, Ioffe Institute, St. Petersburg 194021, Russia

2. Advanced Technology Institute & School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK

Abstract

This paper provides a demonstration-of-concept of a new methodology for comparing field electron emission (FE) theory and experiment. It uses the parameter κ in the mathematical equation I m = CV m κ exp[– B / V m ] (where B and C are weakly varying or constants) that is taken to describe how measured current I m depends on measured voltage V m for electronically ideal FE systems (i.e. systems that (i) have constant configuration during voltage application and (ii) have I m ( V m ) given by the emission physics alone). Experimental parameter values ( κ m ) are used to compare two alternative FE theories, for which allowable (but different) κ ranges have been established. At present, contributions to the ‘total theoretical κ ’ made by voltage dependence of notional emission area are not well known: simulations reported here provide data about four commonly investigated emitter shapes. The methodology is then applied to compare 1928/1929 Fowler–Nordheim (FN) FE theory and 1956 Murphy–Good (MG) FE theory. It is theoretically certain that the 1956 theory is ‘better physics’ than the 1928/1929 theory. As in previous attempts to reach known correct theoretical conclusions by experimentally based argument, the new methodology tends to favour MG FE theory, but is formally indecisive at this stage. Further progress needs better methods of establishing error limits and of measuring κ m .

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference40 articles.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3