Abstract
A critical issue in international development is how donor-funded programs can support sustainable and long-lasting changes in assisted countries. Among the factors associated with sustainability is improved governance. However, many donor-funded initiatives are focused on achieving results in specific sectors, such as health, education, and agriculture. How can how governance interventions contribute to achieving sector-specific results? This brief explores this question and discusses how international development practice has incorporated recognition of the links between governance and sector outcomes. The brief develops a stylized continuum of how governance elements relate to sector interventions and contribute to expected outcomes. We discuss factors that either impede or impel governance integration and close with some observations regarding prospects for integrated programming. The audience for the brief is the international development policy and practitioner communities, and secondarily, academics with an interest in the topic. Key take-aways include: (1) there is ample evidence of positive contributions from improved governance to sector-specific outcomes, but few guideposts exist for practical and effective governance integration; (2) barriers to integration include urgent sector priorities that overshadow governance concerns, requirements to demonstrate progress towards ambitious sector targets, and complex choices related to measurement; and (3) sustainability and self-reliance are major drivers for integration and are facilitated by the flexibility and adaptation that governance integration enables.
Reference35 articles.
1. 1. Mansoor Z, Williams MJ. Systems approaches to public service delivery: lessons from health, education, and infrastructure. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, Blavatnick School of Government; 2018.
2. 2. World Bank. Governance: the World Bank's experience. Washington (DC): World Bank; 1994.
3. 3. Brinkerhoff DW, Brinkerhoff JM. Public sector management reform in developing countries: perspectives beyond NPM orthodoxy. Public Adm Dev 2015;35(4):222–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1739
4. 4. Buntaine MT, Parks BC, Buch BP. Aiming at the wrong targets: the domestic consequences of international efforts to build institutions. Int Stud Q 2017;61(2):471–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx013
5. High-value natural resources and transparency: accounting for revenues and governance.;Marsland,2016
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献