Integrated Governance: Achieving Governance Results and Contributing to Sector Outcomes

Author:

Frazer SarahORCID,Granius Mark,Brinkerhoff Derick W.ORCID,McGregor LisaORCID

Abstract

Achieving broad-based socio-economic development requires interventions that bridge disciplines, strategies, and stakeholders. Effective sustained progress requires more than simply an accumulation of sector projects, and poverty reduction, individual wellbeing, community development, and societal advancement do not fall neatly into sectoral categories. However, researchers and practitioners recognize key operational challenges to achieving effective integration that stem from the structures and processes associated with the current practice of international development. Integration calls for the intentional linking of intervention designs, implementation, and evaluation across sectors and disciplines to achieve mutually reinforcing outcomes. In this report, we summarize the results of a study we conducted to explore the challenges facing governance programs that integrate with sector interventions to achieve governance outcomes and contribute to sector outcomes. Through a review of policy documents and project reports from recent integrated governance programs and interviews with donor and practitioner staff, we found three integrated governance programming variants, an emphasis on citizen and government collaboration to improve service delivery, interventions that serve as the glue between sectors, and a balancing act for indicators to measure contribution to sectoral outcomes. Our analysis identified four key success factors: contextual readiness, the application of learning and adapting approaches, donor support, and recognition of the limitations of integrated governance. We then discuss recommendations and implications and for answering the challenge of integrating governance and sector programming to achieve development outcomes.

Publisher

RTI Press

Reference35 articles.

1. 1. Hirschman AO. Development projects observed. Washington (DC): Brookings Institution Press; 1967.

2. 2. Brinkerhoff DW, Wetterberg A. Governance and sector outcomes: making the connections. RTI Press Publication No. PB-0019-1809. RTI Press; 2018. https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2018.pb.0019.1809

3. 3. Kumar K. A.I.D.'s experience with integrated rural development projects. Program evaluation report No. 19. Washington (DC): USAID; 1987 Jul. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNAAL095.PDF

4. 4. Lele U. The design of rural development: lessons from Africa. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University; 1975.

5. 5. Masset E. Integrated development: past and present. IDS Bull 2018;49(4). Available from: https://bulletin.ids.ac.uk/index.php/idsbo/article/view/2994/Online%20article

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3