The Value of Integrating Governance and Sector Programs: Evidence from Senegal

Author:

Frazer Sarah1ORCID,Wetterberg Anna1ORCID,Johnson Eric1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. RTI International

Abstract

As the global community works toward the Sustainable Development Goals, closer integration between governance and sectoral interventions offers a promising, yet unproven avenue for improving health service delivery. We interrogate what value an integrated governance approach, intentionally combining governance and sectoral investments in strategic collaboration, adds to health service readiness and delivery using data from a study in Senegal. Our quasi-experimental research design compared treatment and control communes to determine the value added of an integrated governance approach in Senegal compared to health interventions alone. Our analysis shows that integrated governance is associated with improvements in some health service delivery dimensions, specifically, in aspects of health facility access and quality. These findings—that health facilities are more open, with higher quality infrastructure and staff more frequently following correct procedures after integrated governance treatment—suggests a higher level of service readiness. We suggest that capacity building of governance structures and an emphasis on social accountability could explain the added value of integrating governance and health programming. These elements may help overcome a critical bottleneck between citizens and local government often seen with narrower sector or governance-only approaches. We discuss implications for health services in Senegal, international development program design, and further research.

Publisher

RTI Press

Reference33 articles.

1. 1United States Agency for International Development (USAID). US foreign aid explorer. Washington (DC): USAID; 2021 [cited 2021 March 24]. Available from: https://explorer.usaid.gov/aid-trends.html

2. 2World Bank. World development report 2017: governance and the law. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2017. 10.1596/978-1-4648-0950-7

3. 3USAID. USAID strategy on democracy human rights and governance; 2013. https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1866/USAID-DRG_fina-_6-24-31.pdf

4. 4Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M. Governance matters VIII: aggregate and individual governance indicators, 1996-2008 World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4978. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2009 Jun 29.10.1596/1813-9450-4978

5. 5Brinkerhoff DW. Democratic governance and sectoral policy reform: tracing linkages and exploring synergies. World Dev 2000;28(4):601-15. 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00147-3

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3