Contemporary Debates on Equity in STEM Education: Takeaways From a Doctoral Seminar in Equity in STEM Education

Author:

Goldberg Elizabeth R1,DARWIN TAYLOR Kirkpatrick1ORCID,Esquibel Jesus S.1,Noble Samanthia1,Allen Miranda Mullins1,Pinheiro Weverton Ataide1

Affiliation:

1. Texas Tech University

Abstract

As the emerging field of equity in STEM education continues to grow, debates surrounding how to best serve populations with historically restricted access and successful outcomes within the STEM fields is growing as well. In this article, a group of doctoral students who took a course titled Equity in STEM Education and discusses their takeaways regarding the literature discussed in the course. The topics covered in this article will center around Gutiérrez’s (2007) equity framework of power, identity, access, and achievement. Through the lens of the equity framework, the dimension of power will be used to present discourse on the sociopolitical turn in STEM education. Identity will be used to explore debates on race, poverty, gender, and sexuality within STEM equity and education. Access will be used to examine discussions on students’ ability to achieve STEM equity in rural settings and within specific domains such as computer science. Finally, achievement will be used to explore arguments on both sides of the achievement gap research. To conclude, we urge researchers, educators, and policymakers to listen and act upon the work of contemporary scholars in order to achieve an equitable STEM education system.

Publisher

Ax Publications

Reference91 articles.

1. Achieve. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. https://www.nextgenscience.org/

2. Adams, R., & Farnsworth, M. (2020). Culturally responsive teacher education for rural and Native communities. Multicultural Perspectives, 22(2), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2020.1741367

3. Ataide Pinheiro, W. (2021). Dismantling the ‘all-boys club’ a narrative of contradictions women experience in PhD mathematics programs: A Freirean approach. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11090

4. Ataide Pinheiro, W. (2022). At the intersections: Queer high school students’ experiences with the teaching of mathematics for social justice (Order No. 29320623) [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/at-intersections-queer-high-school-students/docview/2714474666/se-2

5. Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K–12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3