Abstract
AbstractConsumer virtual reality (VR) systems are increasingly being deployed in research to study sensorimotor behaviors, but properties of such systems require verification before being used as scientific tools. The ‘motion-to-photon’ latency (the lag between a user making a movement and the movement being displayed within the display) is a particularly important metric as temporal delays can degrade sensorimotor performance. Extant approaches to quantifying this measure have involved the use of bespoke software and hardware and produce a single measure of latency and ignore the effect of the motion prediction algorithms used in modern VR systems. This reduces confidence in the generalizability of the results. We developed a novel, system-independent, high-speed camera-based latency measurement technique to co-register real and virtual controller movements, allowing assessment of how latencies change through a movement. We applied this technique to measure the motion-to-photon latency of controller movements in the HTC Vive, Oculus Rift, Oculus Rift S, and Valve Index, using the Unity game engine and SteamVR. For the start of a sudden movement, all measured headsets had mean latencies between 21 and 42 ms. Once motion prediction could account for the inherent delays, the latency was functionally reduced to 2–13 ms, and our technique revealed that this reduction occurs within ~25–58 ms of movement onset. Our findings indicate that sudden accelerations (e.g., movement onset, impacts, and direction changes) will increase latencies and lower spatial accuracy. Our technique allows researchers to measure these factors and determine the impact on their experimental design before collecting sensorimotor data from VR systems.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference74 articles.
1. Abdlkarim, D., Di Luca, M., Aves, P., Yeo, S.-H., Miall, R. C., Holland, P., & Galea, J. M. (2022). A methodological framework to assess the accuracy of virtual reality hand-tracking systems: A case study with the oculus quest 2. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.18.481001
2. Adelstein, B. D., Johnston, E. R., & Ellis, S. R. (1996). Dynamic response of electromagnetic spatial displacement trackers. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 5(3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1996.5.3.302
3. Adelstein, B. D., Lee, T. G., & Ellis, S. R. (2003). Head tracking latency in virtual environments: Psychophysics and a model. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 47, 2083–2087.
4. Bebko, A. O., & Troje, N. F. (2020). bmlTUX: Design and control of experiments in virtual reality and beyond. I-Perception, 11(4), 1–12.
5. Becher, A., Angerer, J., & Grauschopf, T. (2018). Novel Approach to Measure Motion-To-Photon and Mouth-To-Ear Latency in Distributed Virtual Reality Systems. ArXiv:1809.06320 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.06320
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献