Author:
Diamond Shari Seidman,Vidmar Neil
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Juries in the Digital Age: Managing Juror Online and Social Media Use During Trial;Australian Courts;2022
2. Facts into faults: The grammar of guilt in jury deliberations;Discourse Studies;2021-05-02
3. Storytelling Rituals in Jury Deliberations;Oñati Socio-legal Series;2019-05-14
4. Psychology and the Federal Rules of Evidence;Advances in Psychology and Law;2016
5. The Cases for and against Blindfolding the Jury11This chapter is adapted, in part, from three prior publications: Diamond and Casper, 1992, Diamond et al., 1989, and Diamond and Vidmar, 2001. I use the term blindfolding, rather than blinding, because when information is withheld from an individual, the individual may fill in the missing information based on previous experience and outside knowledge, sometimes correctly and sometimes incorrectly (i.e., peeks through the blindfold). A decision maker who peeks is not effectively blinded.;Blinding as a Solution to Bias;2016