The Cases for and against Blindfolding the Jury11This chapter is adapted, in part, from three prior publications: Diamond and Casper, 1992, Diamond et al., 1989, and Diamond and Vidmar, 2001. I use the term blindfolding, rather than blinding, because when information is withheld from an individual, the individual may fill in the missing information based on previous experience and outside knowledge, sometimes correctly and sometimes incorrectly (i.e., peeks through the blindfold). A decision maker who peeks is not effectively blinded.
Author:
Diamond Shari Seidman
Reference32 articles.
1. Cognitions, attitudes and decision-making in search and seizure cases;Casper;Journal of Applied Social Psychology,1988
2. Juror decision making, attitudes, and the hindsight bias;Casper;Law and Human Behavior,1989
3. Citizen comprehension of difficult issues: lessons from civil jury trials;Cecil;American University Law Review,1991
4. Blindfolding the jury to verdict consequences: damages, experts, and the civil jury;Diamond;Law and Society Review,1992
5. Blindfolding the jury;Diamond;Law and Contemporary Problems,1989