Identification Criteria for Learning Disabilities: A Survey of the Research Literature

Author:

Kavale Kenneth1,Nye Chad2

Affiliation:

1. Education, School of Education, University of California, Riverside

2. Special Education, School of Education, University of California, Riverside

Abstract

A survey of 307 research studies in learning disabilities (LD) was conducted to determine the nature and characteristics of the LD identification criteria used. Five categories of LD identification criteria were found; however, in one half of the studies LD subjects were selected on the basis of previous classification or diagnosis. Besides the identification criteria categories, research studies were also surveyed for the actual identification criteria included. Six criteria were identified with exclusion, discrepancy, process, and neurological components being the primary ones. It was concluded that the learning disabilities research literature presents a divergent picture of the nature and characteristics of learning disabilities and reflects a lack of consensus regarding standard identification criteria. Consequently, the LD research literature does not present narrowly fo-cussed subject samples suggesting continued difficulties with generalization and replication of results.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,General Health Professions,Education

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Rethinking the Concept of Learning Disabilities;The Handbook of Education and Human Development;2018-03-06

2. Learning Disability Identification Criteria and Reporting in Empirical Research: A Review of 2001-2013;Learning Disabilities Research & Practice;2016-09-26

3. Evaluating the Congruence among Methods of Reading Disability Identification;Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment;1994-09

4. A Decade of Research on Learning Disabilities;Journal of Learning Disabilities;1994-01

5. Dysrationalia;Journal of Learning Disabilities;1993-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3