Author:
Curtis Helen J,MacKenna Brian,Croker Richard,Inglesby Peter,Walker Alex J,Morley Jessica,Mehrkar Amir,Morton Caroline E,Bacon Seb,Hickman George,Bates Chris,Evans David,Ward Tom,Cockburn Jonathan,Davy Simon,Bhaskaran Krishnan,Schultze Anna,Rentsch Christopher T,Williamson Elizabeth J,Hulme William J,McDonald Helen I,Tomlinson Laurie,Mathur Rohini,Drysdale Henry,Eggo Rosalind M,Wing Kevin,Wong Angel YS,Forbes Harriet,Parry John,Hester Frank,Harper Sam,Evans Stephen JW,Douglas Ian J,Smeeth Liam,Goldacre Ben,
Abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare activity. The NHS stopped non-urgent work in March 2020, later recommending services be restored to near-normal levels before winter where possible.AimTo describe the volume and variation of coded clinical activity in general practice, taking respiratory disease and laboratory procedures as examples.Design and settingWorking on behalf of NHS England, a cohort study was conducted of 23.8 million patient records in general practice, in situ using OpenSAFELY.MethodActivity using Clinical Terms Version 3 codes and keyword searches from January 2019 to September 2020 are described.ResultsActivity recorded in general practice declined during the pandemic, but largely recovered by September. There was a large drop in coded activity for laboratory tests, with broad recovery to pre-pandemic levels by September. One exception was the international normalised ratio test, with a smaller reduction (median tests per 1000 patients in 2020: February 8.0; April 6.2; September 6.9). The pattern of recording for respiratory symptoms was less affected, following an expected seasonal pattern and classified as ‘no change’. Respiratory infections exhibited a sustained drop, not returning to pre-pandemic levels by September. Asthma reviews experienced a small drop but recovered, whereas chronic obstructive pulmonary disease reviews remained below baseline.ConclusionAn open-source software framework was delivered to describe trends and variation in clinical activity across an unprecedented scale of primary care data. The COVD-19 pandemic led to a substantial change in healthcare activity. Most laboratory tests showed substantial reduction, largely recovering to near-normal levels by September, with some important tests less affected and recording of respiratory disease codes was mixed.
Publisher
Royal College of General Practitioners
Reference16 articles.
1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2021) COVID-19 situation update worldwide, as of week 33, updated 26 August 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20210831033332/https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/geographical-distribution-2019-ncov-cases (accessed 27 Oct 2021).
2. World Health Organization (2020) WHO releases guidelines to help countries maintain essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.who.int/news/item/30-03-2020-who-releases-guidelines-to-help-countries-maintain-essential-health-services-during-the-covid-19-pandemic (accessed 27 Oct 2021).
3. World Health Organization (2020) COVID-19 Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan: operational planning guidelines to support country preparedness and response. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/covid-19-sprp-unct-guidelines.pdf (accessed 27 Oct 2021).
4. NHS England (2020) Urgent next steps on NHS response to Covid-19: Simon Stevens’ letter to local NHS organisations. https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/urgent-next-steps-on-nhs-response-to-covid-19-letter-simon-stevens.pdf (accessed 27 Oct 2021).
5. World Health Organization NDCs and COVID-19. https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/covid-19 (accessed 27 Oct 2021).