OpenSAFELY: The impact of COVID‐19 on azathioprine, leflunomide and methotrexate monitoring, and factors associated with change in monitoring rate

Author:

Brown Andrew D.1ORCID,Fisher Louis1,Curtis Helen J.1,Wiedemann Milan1,Hulme William J.1,Speed Victoria1ORCID,Hopcroft Lisa E. M.1,Cunningham Christine1,Costello Ruth E.2,Galloway James B.3,Russell Mark D.3,Bechman Katie3,Kurt Zeyneb4,Croker Richard1,Wood Chris1ORCID,Walker Alex J.1,Schaffer Andrea L.1ORCID,Bacon Seb C. J.1,Mehrkar Amir1,Hickman George1,Bates Chris5,Cockburn Jonathan5,Parry John5,Hester Frank5,Harper Sam5,Goldacre Ben1, ,MacKenna Brian1

Affiliation:

1. Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford UK

2. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK

3. Centre for Rheumatic Diseases King's College London UK

4. Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne UK

5. TPP Leeds UK

Abstract

AimsThe COVID‐19 pandemic created unprecedented pressure on healthcare services. This study investigates whether disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) safety monitoring was affected during the COVID‐19 pandemic.MethodsA population‐based cohort study was conducted using the OpenSAFELY platform to access electronic health record data from 24.2 million patients registered at general practices using TPP's SystmOne software. Patients were included for further analysis if prescribed azathioprine, leflunomide or methotrexate between November 2019 and July 2022. Outcomes were assessed as monthly trends and variation between various sociodemographic and clinical groups for adherence with standard safety monitoring recommendations.ResultsAn acute increase in the rate of missed monitoring occurred across the study population (+12.4 percentage points) when lockdown measures were implemented in March 2020. This increase was more pronounced for some patient groups (70–79 year‐olds: +13.7 percentage points; females: +12.8 percentage points), regions (North West: +17.0 percentage points), medications (leflunomide: +20.7 percentage points) and monitoring tests (blood pressure: +24.5 percentage points). Missed monitoring rates decreased substantially for all groups by July 2022. Consistent differences were observed in overall missed monitoring rates between several groups throughout the study.ConclusionDMARD monitoring rates temporarily deteriorated during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Deterioration coincided with the onset of lockdown measures, with monitoring rates recovering rapidly as lockdown measures were eased. Differences observed in monitoring rates between medications, tests, regions and patient groups highlight opportunities to tackle potential inequalities in the provision or uptake of monitoring services. Further research should evaluate the causes of the differences identified between groups.

Funder

UK Research and Innovation

Medical Research Council

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

Wiley

Reference39 articles.

1. COVID-19 and primary care in six countries

2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.DMARDs;2022.https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/dmards/

3. BNF content published by NICE [Internet];2022.https://bnf.nice.org.uk/

4. Covid-19: GP surgeries close for two weeks after staff test positive

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3