The impact of COVID-19 on medication reviews in English primary care. An OpenSAFELY-TPP analysis of 20 million adult electronic health records

Author:

,Wood ChristopherORCID,Speed VictoriaORCID,Fisher LouisORCID,Curtis Helen J.ORCID,Schaffer Andrea L.ORCID,Walker Alex J.ORCID,Croker RichardORCID,Brown Andrew D.ORCID,Cunningham ChristineORCID,Hulme William J.ORCID,Andrews Colm D.ORCID,Butler-Cole Ben F. C.,Evans DavidORCID,Inglesby PeterORCID,Dillingham Iain,Bacon Sebastian C.J.ORCID,Davy SimonORCID,Ward TomORCID,Hickman GeorgeORCID,Bridges LucyORCID,O’Dwyer ThomasORCID,Maude StevenORCID,Smith Rebecca M.,Mehrkar AmirORCID,Bates ChrisORCID,Cockburn JonathanORCID,Parry John,Hester Frank,Harper Sam,Goldacre BenORCID,MacKenna BrianORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to routine activity in primary care. Medication reviews are an important primary care activity to ensure safety and appropriateness of ongoing prescribing and a disruption could have significant negative implications for patient care.AimUsing routinely collected data, our aim was to i) describe the SNOMED CT codes used to report medication review activity ii) report the impact of COVID-19 on the volume and variation of medication reviews.Design and settingWith the approval of NHS England, we conducted a cohort study of 20 million adult patient records in general practice, in-situ using the OpenSAFELY platform.MethodFor each month between April 2019 - March 2022, we report the percentage of patients with a medication review coded monthly and in the previous 12 months. These measures were broken down by regional, clinical and demographic subgroups and amongst those prescribed high risk medications.ResultsIn April 2019, 32.3% of patients had a medication review coded in the previous 12 months. During the first COVID-19 lockdown, monthly activity substantially decreased (-21.1% April 2020), but the rate of patients with a medication review coded in the previous 12 months was not substantially impacted according to our classification (-10.5% March 2021). There was regional and ethnic variation (March 2022 - London 21.9% vs North West 33.6%; Chinese 16.8% vs British 33.0%). Following the introduction of “structured medication reviews”, the rate of structured medication review in the last 12 months reached 2.9% by March 2022, with higher percentages in high risk groups (March 2022 - care home residents 34.1%, 90+ years 13.1%, high risk medications 10.2%). The most used SNOMED CT medication review code across the study period wasMedication review done - 314530002(59.5%).ConclusionWe have reported a substantial reduction in the monthly rate of medication reviews during the pandemic but rates recovered by the end of the study period.What is already known about this subjectThe COVID-19 pandemic brought substantial disruption to the delivery of routine tasks in primary care.For the first time on this scale, our study reports the impact of COVID-19 on medication review activity, including the launch of the structured medication review service in England broken down by key demographic, social, and clinical factors.What this study addsThere was a substantial reduction in the monthly rate of medication reviews during the pandemic but rates recovered quickly.The percentage of patients with a medication review varies according to region and ethnicity.Structured medication reviews were adopted rapidly and prioritised for patients at greatest risk of harm from their medicines.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3