Affiliation:
1. Instituto Federal do Piauí, Brazil
2. Universidade de Brasília, Brazil
Abstract
ABSTRACT The objective of this study is to propose a methodology that, using multiple decreases, in addition to classified by actuarial profile and source of social security costs, calculates actuarially fair and balanced rates for unscheduled collective costing benefits from Defined Contribution (DC) pension plans. There are no studies in Brazil about costing rates for benefits not scheduled in pension plans of the DC modality. Any institution that pays collective cost social security benefits must determine an actuarial rate that is not insufficient, generating a financial imbalance in the fund, nor excessive, compromising the participant’s income. This work is the first study on costing rates for collective costing benefits from pension plans with DC modalities. Actuarially fair rates are obtained considering multiple decreases and equalizing the present value of contributions and the present value of pension and disability benefits, classified by actuarial profile and source of social security cost. The specific balance rate is determined for each source of social security costs and is obtained considering the actuarially fair rates for each actuarial profile. The general balance rate is obtained by the marginal contribution of each specific balance rate. The proposed methodology was used to calculate the rates of unscheduled benefits with collective costing in DC modality plans. The proposed methodology estimated that the legal changes, resulting from Constitutional Amendment 103/2019, indirectly increased by more than 4% the general balance rate of the unscheduled benefits of the Supplementary Social Security Foundation of the Federal Public Servant of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government (FUNPRESP-Exe).
Reference32 articles.
1. The RP-2000 mortality tables,2000
2. Uma análise dos aspectos distributivos da aposentadoria por tempo de contribuição do INSS com o emprego de matemática atuarial;Afonso L.;Revista Gestão & Políticas Públicas,2011
3. Adequacy, fairness and sustainability of Pay-As-You-Go-Pension-Systems: Defined benefit versus defined contribution;Alonso-García J.;The European Journal of Finance,2018
4. Addressing longevity heterogeneity in pension scheme design and reform;Ayuso M.;IZA Discussion Paper,2016
5. Actuarial fairness when longevity increases: an evaluation of the Italian pension system;Belloni M.;The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice,2013
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献