Affiliation:
1. Ministry of the Economy of Brazil, Brazil
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper estimates the fuel retailer cartel damages in the city of Londrina, Parana, part south of Brazil, using reduced and structural forms for supply and demand. Brazilian Competition Authority (CADE) documents help to characterize the ethanol and gasoline retailers involved in the collusion. The objective is to evaluate competition policy by comparing the amount of estimated damages with the amount of applied fines. This paper also adds an important result to gasoline substitution, as data shows ethanol is perceived as a perfect substitute and its price is inelastic. Results show an overcharge of 3.6% to 6.6% in the gasoline market and up to 12% in the ethanol market during collusion. Fines should consider the deterrence effect and, giving the low probability of detection, CADE’s applied fines seemed to be in line with this objective.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference21 articles.
1. Are cartel fines optimal? Theory and evidence from the European Union;ALLAIN M-L;International Review Of Law And Economics,2015
2. The demand for ethanol as a gasoline substitute;ANDERSON S. T;Journal of Environmental Economics And Management,2012
3. Anuário 2008,2008
4. Factors influencing the magnitude of cartel overcharges: an empirical analysis of the U.S. market;BOLOTOVA Y.;Journal of Competition Law and Economics,2008
5. Processo 08012.011668-2007-30,2010
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献