Affiliation:
1. USP - University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
Abstract
This study evaluated the profile of implants subjected to torsion test. Four types of implants (Conexão®) were analyzed: Master Porous (MP - external hexagon, cylindrical, double-porous surface implants; 11.5 X 3.75 mm), Master Screw (MS - external hexagon, cylindrical, machined implants; 11.5 X 3.75 mm), Conect Conic (CC - external hexagon, cylindrical, machined implants; 11.5 X 3.5 mm) and Master Conect AR (CA - internal hexagon, cylindrical, double-porous surface implants; 11.5 X 3.75 mm). The Nikon® model C profile projector was used for the analysis before and after torsion test with a Mackena® model MK-20XX digital torque meter. The measures analyzed in the profile of implants were: diameter and height of the platform, diameter of the screw/platform connection, angle of the screw/platform connection, external diameter, internal diameter, thread pitch, height and length of the thread. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey test at 5% significance level. The torsion test caused a visible deformity on the external implant profile. There was a statistical difference among the implants before and after torsion (p<0.05) for the variables: platform diameter, platform height, diameter of the screw/platform connection and length. Changes were observed in platform height of CC and CA, fracture of CA implants, fracture of the MP and MS assembler/connectors, and internal thread stripping of CC. Thus, it was concluded that excessive or some unadvised torque by the manufacturer can lead to changes in different geometric measurements of implants.
Reference20 articles.
1. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: A review;Brånemark R;J Rehabil Res Dev,2001
2. AB, Souza SLS, Barros RRM, Pereira KKY, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Influence of implant surfaces on osseointegration;Novaes Jr;Braz Dent J,2010
3. . Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model;Cheng Z;Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2010
4. . Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants;Ferguson SJ;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2008
5. AB, Papalexiou V, Souza SLS, Taba Jr. M, Palioto DB, et al.. Effect of biofunctionalized implant surface on osseointegration - A histomorphometric study in dogs;Barros RRM;Braz Dent J,2009
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献